LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L
LYP6.DE (Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc) and CNX1.L (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - LYP6.DE is a Europe Equities fund tracking the STOXX® Europe 600, while CNX1.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYP6.DE returned 10.02%/yr vs 21.18%/yr for CNX1.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYP6.DE charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for CNX1.L.
Performance
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYP6.DE is traded in EUR, while CNX1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CNX1.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYP6.DE achieves a 8.98% return, which is significantly lower than CNX1.L's 18.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LYP6.DE has underperformed CNX1.L with an annualized return of 10.02%, while CNX1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 21.18% annualized return.
LYP6.DE
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 2.96%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 11.60%
- 1Y
- 19.51%
- 3Y*
- 14.24%
- 5Y*
- 9.81%
- 10Y*
- 10.02%
CNX1.L
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- 1.41%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 19.44%
- 1Y
- 36.42%
- 3Y*
- 23.26%
- 5Y*
- 17.70%
- 10Y*
- 21.18%
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYP6.DE Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc | 8.98% | 20.82% | 8.25% | 15.97% | -10.40% | 24.81% | -1.72% | 28.59% | -11.28% | 11.31% |
CNX1.L iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 18.40% | 5.75% | 34.71% | 50.84% | -29.37% | 37.92% | 35.46% | 42.13% | 3.33% | 15.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYP6.DE and CNX1.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2013 | 0.58 |
The correlation between LYP6.DE and CNX1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.58 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L — Risk / Return Rank
LYP6.DE
CNX1.L
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYP6.DE | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.39 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 3.48 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.50 | 10.24 | -2.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYP6.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.51%, which is greater than CNX1.L's maximum drawdown of -31.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYP6.DE and CNX1.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYP6.DE | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.51% | -31.25% | -4.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -10.18% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.26% | -26.50% | +10.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.71% | -31.25% | +10.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.51% | -31.25% | -4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -2.78% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.23% | -5.58% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.45% | 3.47% | -1.02% |
Volatility
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) UCITS ETF Acc (LYP6.DE) is 4.31%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (CNX1.L) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that LYP6.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNX1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYP6.DE | CNX1.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 5.34% | -1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.85% | 11.49% | -0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.06% | 15.91% | -2.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 30.93% | -16.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 25.92% | -10.36% |
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYP6.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CNX1.L's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYP6.DE vs. CNX1.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LYP6.DE nor CNX1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LYP6.DE and CNX1.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYP6.DE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYP6.DE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for CNX1.L.
LYP6.DE is categorized as Europe Equities, while CNX1.L is Nasdaq-100. LYP6.DE tracks STOXX® Europe 600, while CNX1.L tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for LYP6.DE and 0.36% for CNX1.L.
Find the right allocation for LYP6.DE and CNX1.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer