PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYMZ.DE is traded in EUR, while CSCO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the CSCO values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMZ.DE achieves a 11.52% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 62.75% return. Over the past 10 years, LYMZ.DE has underperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 15.82%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 18.76% annualized return.


LYMZ.DE

1D
1.36%
1M
3.24%
YTD
11.52%
6M
14.06%
1Y
26.14%
3Y*
25.17%
5Y*
17.14%
10Y*
15.82%

CSCO

1D
-5.68%
1M
35.36%
YTD
62.75%
6M
59.35%
1Y
91.29%
3Y*
35.05%
5Y*
22.34%
10Y*
18.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYMZ.DE
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF
11.52%39.84%15.21%41.48%-21.87%49.32%-15.91%64.99%-24.78%18.73%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
62.75%17.63%28.98%6.02%-17.66%56.66%-11.44%16.38%22.04%15.14%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMZ.DE and CSCO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.32

The correlation between LYMZ.DE and CSCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMZ.DE
LYMZ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMZ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYMZ.DECSCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.54

-0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

6.92

-5.69

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

20.60

-16.63

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMZ.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the CSCO Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMZ.DE and CSCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYMZ.DECSCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

2.96

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.89

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

0.71

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.39

-0.29

Drawdowns

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMZ.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.31%, which is greater than CSCO's maximum drawdown of -58.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMZ.DE and CSCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYMZ.DECSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.31%

-58.91%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.17%

-13.26%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.42%

-23.58%

-7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.28%

-29.17%

-15.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.87%

-41.67%

-22.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-5.68%

+4.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.16%

-18.44%

-21.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.63%

4.45%

+2.18%

Volatility

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF (LYMZ.DE) is 9.89%, while Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a volatility of 16.71%. This indicates that LYMZ.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYMZ.DECSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.89%

16.71%

-6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.73%

26.85%

-1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.86%

31.05%

+0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.01%

25.32%

+9.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.32%

26.63%

+9.69%

Dividends

LYMZ.DE vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

LYMZ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSCO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.36%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.36%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%
LYMZ.DE
Amundi EURO STOXX 50 Daily (2x) Leveraged UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYMZ.DE and CSCO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYMZ.DE and CSCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer