LYMD.DE vs. PINS

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS).

LYMD.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI India. It was launched on Oct 25, 2006.

Performance

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
LYMD.DE Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc	-13.85%	-10.62%	15.81%	14.99%	-2.96%	34.12%	2.23%	-0.72%
PINS Pinterest, Inc.	-28.27%	-21.32%	-16.54%	47.98%	-29.07%	-40.71%	224.40%	-23.47%

Different Trading Currencies

LYMD.DE is traded in EUR, while PINS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PINS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMD.DE achieves a -13.85% return, which is significantly higher than PINS's -28.27% return.

LYMD.DE

• 1D: 0.87%
• 1M: -9.10%
• YTD: -13.85%
• 6M: -11.93%
• 1Y: -16.94%
• 3Y*: 3.77%
• 5Y*: 3.76%
• 10Y*: 6.31%

PINS

• 1D: -0.38%
• 1M: 5.74%
• YTD: -28.27%
• 6M: -41.76%
• 1Y: -44.95%
• 3Y*: -14.33%
• 5Y*: -24.86%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LYMD.DE vs. PINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMD.DE

LYMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1
LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
LYMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
LYMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1
LYMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
LYMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 0

PINS

PINS Risk / Return Rank: 12
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 10
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYMD.DE	PINS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.99	-0.82	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.36	-1.01	-0.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	0.85	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.79	-0.73	-0.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-2.04	-1.55	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.99, which is comparable to the PINS Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMD.DE and PINS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYMD.DE	PINS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.99	-0.82	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23	-0.45	+0.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	-0.07	+0.24

Correlation

The correlation between LYMD.DE and PINS is 0.19, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYMD.DE nor PINS has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.71%, smaller than the maximum PINS drawdown of -82.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMD.DE and PINS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYMD.DE	PINS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.71%	-82.70%	+13.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.70%	-60.63%	+38.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.55%	-82.07%	+52.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-41.38%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-28.51%	-79.48%	+50.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.26%	-51.65%	+33.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.44%	28.30%	-19.86%

Volatility

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) is 5.91%, while Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) has a volatility of 9.89%. This indicates that LYMD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYMD.DE	PINS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.91%	9.89%	-3.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.16%	43.30%	-32.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.12%	54.67%	-37.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.02%	55.95%	-39.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.11%	61.63%	-41.52%