PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYMD.DE vs. PINS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LYMD.DE is traded in EUR, while PINS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PINS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYMD.DE achieves a -11.03% return, which is significantly higher than PINS's -15.64% return.


LYMD.DE

1D
0.99%
1M
-3.80%
YTD
-11.03%
6M
-12.28%
1Y
-15.14%
3Y*
1.77%
5Y*
3.60%
10Y*
6.18%

PINS

1D
0.01%
1M
3.23%
YTD
-15.64%
6M
-19.09%
1Y
-36.97%
3Y*
-6.89%
5Y*
-18.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYMD.DE
Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc
-11.03%-10.62%15.81%14.99%-2.96%34.12%2.23%-0.72%
PINS
Pinterest, Inc.
-15.64%-21.32%-16.54%47.98%-29.07%-40.71%224.40%-23.47%

Correlation

The correlation between LYMD.DE and PINS is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2019

0.18

The correlation between LYMD.DE and PINS shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYMD.DE vs. PINS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYMD.DE
LYMD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 22
Overall Rank
LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYMD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

PINS
PINS Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
PINS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PINS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
PINS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
PINS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
PINS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) and Pinterest, Inc. (PINS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LYMD.DEPINSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.46

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.86

0.88

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

-0.60

-0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.49

-1.05

-0.43

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYMD.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.91, which is comparable to the PINS Sharpe Ratio of -0.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYMD.DE and PINS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LYMD.DEPINSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.91

-0.75

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

-0.33

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

-0.04

+0.21

Drawdowns

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYMD.DE drawdown since its inception was -68.71%, smaller than the maximum PINS drawdown of -82.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYMD.DE and PINS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYMD.DEPINSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.71%

-82.36%

+13.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.60%

-61.59%

+40.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.55%

-69.06%

+39.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.55%

-80.87%

+51.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.17%

-74.75%

+48.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.32%

-50.06%

+31.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.84%

35.12%

-25.28%

Volatility

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI India II UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYMD.DE) is 5.64%, while Pinterest, Inc. (PINS) has a volatility of 14.07%. This indicates that LYMD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PINS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYMD.DEPINSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.64%

14.07%

-8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.24%

38.14%

-24.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.06%

49.74%

-33.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

55.70%

-39.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.15%

61.32%

-41.17%

Dividends

LYMD.DE vs. PINS - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYMD.DE nor PINS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYMD.DE and PINS have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYMD.DE and PINS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer