LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L
LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) and ISPY.L (L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LYM9.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered, while ISPY.L is a Cybersecurity fund tracking the ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYM9.DE returned 10.13%/yr vs 16.52%/yr for ISPY.L. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYM9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for ISPY.L.
Performance
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LYM9.DE is traded in EUR, while ISPY.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the ISPY.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYM9.DE achieves a 26.94% return, which is significantly lower than ISPY.L's 48.83% return. Over the past 10 years, LYM9.DE has underperformed ISPY.L with an annualized return of 10.13%, while ISPY.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.52% annualized return.
LYM9.DE
- 1D
- 0.71%
- 1M
- -10.97%
- 6M
- 19.09%
- YTD
- 26.94%
- 1Y
- 54.24%
- 3Y*
- 7.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.98%
- 10Y*
- 10.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.86%
ISPY.L
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 14.02%
- 6M
- 53.13%
- YTD
- 48.83%
- 1Y
- 44.36%
- 3Y*
- 27.75%
- 5Y*
- 12.73%
- 10Y*
- 16.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.45%
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 26.94% | 29.63% | -7.98% | -21.17% | -13.12% | 1.13% | 46.09% | 50.04% | -9.16% | 15.64% |
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 48.83% | -4.95% | 25.46% | 37.20% | -28.46% | 16.29% | 29.78% | 33.64% | 13.05% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYM9.DE and ISPY.L is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2015 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LYM9.DE and ISPY.L has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L — Risk / Return Rank
LYM9.DE
ISPY.L
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) and L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LYM9.DE | ISPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.83 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.29 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.21 | 2.25 | +1.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.85 | 5.83 | +10.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYM9.DE drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than ISPY.L's maximum drawdown of -53.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYM9.DE and ISPY.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYM9.DE | ISPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -53.22% | -18.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.83% | -19.63% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.12% | -30.52% | -8.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.00% | -33.97% | -21.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.00% | -33.97% | -21.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -4.03% | -8.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.59% | -15.77% | -26.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.41% | 7.59% | -4.18% |
Volatility
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) is 8.58%, while L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF (ISPY.L) has a volatility of 10.70%. This indicates that LYM9.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ISPY.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYM9.DE | ISPY.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.58% | 10.70% | -2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.69% | 25.07% | -6.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 28.16% | -5.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.58% | 28.25% | -5.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.92% | 25.03% | -3.11% |
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYM9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than ISPY.L's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYM9.DE vs. ISPY.L - Dividend Comparison
LYM9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, while ISPY.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISPY.L L&G Cyber Security UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 0.33% | 0.42% | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.70% | 1.12% | 0.67% | 0.89% | 1.50% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYM9.DE and ISPY.L have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LYM9.DE is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LYM9.DE is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for ISPY.L.
LYM9.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ISPY.L is Cybersecurity. LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered, while ISPY.L tracks ISE Cyber Security UCITS Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LYM9.DE and 0.69% for ISPY.L.
Find the right allocation for LYM9.DE and ISPY.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer