LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
LYM9.DE (Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LYM9.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered, while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LYM9.DE returned 11.14%/yr vs 21.42%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYM9.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.
Performance
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LYM9.DE achieves a 37.23% return, which is significantly higher than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LYM9.DE has underperformed 6AQQ.DE with an annualized return of 11.14%, while 6AQQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 21.42% annualized return.
LYM9.DE
- 1D
- -2.36%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 37.23%
- 6M
- 36.72%
- 1Y
- 74.72%
- 3Y*
- 8.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- 11.14%
6AQQ.DE
- 1D
- -0.84%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 20.65%
- 6M
- 18.79%
- 1Y
- 37.28%
- 3Y*
- 24.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.87%
- 10Y*
- 21.42%
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 37.23% | 29.63% | -7.97% | -21.17% | -13.14% | 1.12% | 46.11% | 50.04% | -9.16% | 15.64% |
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 20.65% | 7.08% | 33.77% | 51.54% | -29.96% | 39.62% | 34.72% | 42.90% | 3.22% | 15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between LYM9.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2010 | 0.63 |
The correlation between LYM9.DE and 6AQQ.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LYM9.DE
6AQQ.DE
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LYM9.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.42 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.45 | 3.77 | +5.68 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 31.90 | 11.17 | +20.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LYM9.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.65 | 2.41 | +1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 | 0.94 | -0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | 1.08 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 1.08 | -1.03 |
Drawdowns
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LYM9.DE drawdown since its inception was -72.01%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYM9.DE and 6AQQ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LYM9.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.01% | -31.19% | -40.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.81% | -10.01% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.61% | -26.73% | -14.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.00% | -31.19% | -23.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -55.00% | -31.19% | -23.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.77% | -0.84% | -1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.85% | -5.36% | -37.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.32% | 3.39% | -1.07% |
Volatility
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison
Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM9.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.97% compared to Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) at 4.40%. This indicates that LYM9.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LYM9.DE | 6AQQ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | 4.40% | +3.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.84% | 10.96% | +4.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.25% | 15.66% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.20% | 19.83% | +2.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.82% | 19.63% | +2.19% |
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LYM9.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.
Dividends
LYM9.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison
LYM9.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LYM9.DE Amundi MSCI New Energy ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist | 0.31% | 0.42% | 0.74% | 0.78% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 0.70% | 1.12% | 0.67% | 0.89% | 1.50% | 2.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LYM9.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM9.DE.
LYM9.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. LYM9.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI New Energy ESG Filtered, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LYM9.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.
Find the right allocation for LYM9.DE and 6AQQ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer