LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LYM8.DE (Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LYM8.DE is a Water Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI IMI Water ESG Filtered, while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LYM8.DE returned 5.71%/yr vs 18.87%/yr for 6AQQ.DE. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LYM8.DE charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.

Performance

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM8.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYM8.DE achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return.

LYM8.DE

• 1D: -0.07%
• 1M: -3.26%
• YTD: -0.12%
• 6M: -1.37%
• 1Y: -1.94%
• 3Y*: 6.96%
• 5Y*: 5.71%
• 10Y*: —

6AQQ.DE

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 20.65%
• 6M: 18.79%
• 1Y: 37.28%
• 3Y*: 24.68%
• 5Y*: 18.87%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LYM8.DE Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	-0.12%	2.13%	11.49%	18.92%	-17.25%	35.01%	6.62%	40.53%	-13.88%	2.80%
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR	20.65%	7.08%	33.77%	51.54%	-29.96%	39.62%	34.72%	42.90%	3.22%	4.23%

Correlation

The correlation between LYM8.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2017	0.60

Over the past year, the correlation between LYM8.DE and 6AQQ.DE has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYM8.DE

LYM8.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
LYM8.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7

6AQQ.DE

6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM8.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LYM8.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.19	2.41	-2.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.19	3.20	-3.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.42	-0.44
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.23	3.77	-4.00
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.54	11.17	-11.71
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYM8.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.19, which is lower than the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYM8.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LYM8.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.19	2.41	-2.60
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39	0.94	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	1.08	-0.58

Drawdowns

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYM8.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.55%, which is greater than 6AQQ.DE's maximum drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYM8.DE and 6AQQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LYM8.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.55%	-31.19%	-5.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.22%	-10.01%	-0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.93%	-26.73%	+9.80%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.56%	-31.19%	+6.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.06%	-0.84%	-8.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.49%	-5.36%	-1.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.34%	3.39%	+0.95%

Volatility

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist (LYM8.DE) is 3.59%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that LYM8.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LYM8.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.59%	4.40%	-0.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.33%	10.96%	-1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	15.66%	-3.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.43%	19.83%	-5.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.06%	19.63%	-3.57%

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYM8.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

LYM8.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

LYM8.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, while 6AQQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LYM8.DE Amundi MSCI Water ESG Screened UCITS ETF Dist	1.08%	1.08%	0.77%	0.85%	0.43%	0.62%	1.22%	1.49%	2.09%	1.61%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LYM8.DE and 6AQQ.DE in my portfolio?

LYM8.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LYM8.DE or 6AQQ.DE?

On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LYM8.DE or 6AQQ.DE?

6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for LYM8.DE.

What is the main difference between LYM8.DE and 6AQQ.DE?

LYM8.DE is categorized as Water Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. LYM8.DE tracks MSCI ACWI IMI Water ESG Filtered, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LYM8.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.