PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYM7.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYM7.DE achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly higher than XGLF.DE's 4.58% return. Over the past 10 years, LYM7.DE has outperformed XGLF.DE with an annualized return of 7.87%, while XGLF.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 7.33% annualized return.


LYM7.DE

1D
-1.91%
1M
-8.26%
6M
11.39%
YTD
19.22%
1Y
32.77%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
6.66%
10Y*
7.87%

XGLF.DE

1D
-0.17%
1M
-2.76%
6M
-1.28%
YTD
4.58%
1Y
2.52%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
5.07%
10Y*
7.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LYM7.DE
Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc
19.22%18.54%13.46%4.96%-14.27%4.09%5.83%21.46%-11.74%20.27%
XGLF.DE
Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc)
4.58%-5.36%9.58%0.55%1.24%48.84%-9.49%9.50%22.95%-7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between LYM7.DE and XGLF.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.44

The correlation between LYM7.DE and XGLF.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LYM7.DE
LYM7.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
LYM7.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYM7.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

XGLF.DE
XGLF.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
XGLF.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XGLF.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
XGLF.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
XGLF.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
XGLF.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYM7.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYM7.DEXGLF.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.05

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.93

0.28

+2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.06

0.60

+8.45

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYM7.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is higher than the XGLF.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYM7.DE and XGLF.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYM7.DE drawdown since its inception was -62.13%, which is greater than XGLF.DE's maximum drawdown of -42.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYM7.DE and XGLF.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYM7.DEXGLF.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.13%

-42.15%

-19.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.12%

-9.05%

-2.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.15%

-18.41%

-0.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.14%

-31.29%

+8.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.88%

-35.16%

+3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.12%

-18.93%

+7.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.78%

-18.25%

+2.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.61%

4.18%

-0.57%

Volatility

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets III UCITS ETF EUR Acc (LYM7.DE) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Xtrackers MSCI GCC Select Swap UCITS ETF (Acc) (XGLF.DE) at 3.12%. This indicates that LYM7.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGLF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYM7.DEXGLF.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.46%

3.12%

+5.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.94%

9.08%

+8.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.39%

12.57%

+7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.33%

15.37%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

18.33%

+0.13%

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYM7.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than XGLF.DE's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYM7.DE vs. XGLF.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LYM7.DE nor XGLF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LYM7.DE and XGLF.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LYM7.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LYM7.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for XGLF.DE.

LYM7.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets, while XGLF.DE tracks MSCI GCC Countries ex Select Securities Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LYM7.DE and 0.65% for XGLF.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYM7.DE and XGLF.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer