PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LYFIX vs. THQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LYFIX vs. THQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LYFIX achieves a 12.83% return, which is significantly higher than THQ's 4.92% return.


LYFIX

1D
-2.71%
1M
-5.73%
6M
10.47%
YTD
12.83%
1Y
49.41%
3Y*
10.25%
5Y*
9.19%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.44%

THQ

1D
0.11%
1M
-0.20%
6M
3.13%
YTD
4.92%
1Y
30.23%
3Y*
10.77%
5Y*
3.91%
10Y*
9.02%
ALL TIME*
7.96%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$3.19M$4.28M$3.80M

LYFIX vs. THQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
12.83%28.22%-0.27%7.19%-0.92%-3.42%54.83%1.20%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
4.92%13.88%15.51%-1.62%-17.53%33.39%15.20%3.70%

Correlation

The correlation between LYFIX and THQ is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.57

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2019

0.56

The correlation between LYFIX and THQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LYFIX vs. THQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LYFIX
LYFIX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LYFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
LYFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

THQ
THQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
THQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
THQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
THQ Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LYFIX vs. THQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) and Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LYFIXTHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.30

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.04

1.81

+4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.21

6.21

+13.01

LYFIX vs. THQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LYFIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is higher than the THQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LYFIX and THQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LYFIX vs. THQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LYFIX drawdown since its inception was -35.33%, smaller than the maximum THQ drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LYFIX and THQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LYFIXTHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.33%

-39.35%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.49%

-16.74%

+8.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.78%

-25.86%

+3.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.46%

-32.20%

+1.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.81%

-1.26%

-6.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.68%

-8.54%

-1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.66%

4.88%

-2.22%

Volatility

LYFIX vs. THQ - Volatility Comparison

AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund (LYFIX) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund (THQ) at 4.30%. This indicates that LYFIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than THQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LYFIXTHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.91%

4.30%

+2.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.68%

13.68%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.86%

18.11%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.90%

19.22%

+3.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.42%

20.53%

+2.89%

LYFIX vs. THQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LYFIX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is lower than THQ's 1.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

LYFIX vs. THQ - Dividend Comparison

LYFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.58%, less than THQ's 11.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LYFIX
AlphaCentric LifeSci Healthcare Fund
1.58%1.78%2.24%2.63%4.43%12.88%2.30%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
THQ
Abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
11.51%11.29%11.09%7.45%6.81%5.27%6.62%7.08%8.05%7.71%8.70%9.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


LYFIX and THQ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LYFIX has higher volatility (6.91%) compared to THQ (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LYFIX dropped -35.33% vs THQ's -39.35%.

LYFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LYFIX and THQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer