PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LWCR.DE achieves a 10.71% return, which is significantly lower than CBUG.DE's 18.13% return.


LWCR.DE

1D
-0.58%
1M
0.97%
YTD
10.71%
6M
11.27%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
17.28%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
13.15%

CBUG.DE

1D
0.65%
1M
4.21%
YTD
18.13%
6M
18.13%
1Y
33.69%
3Y*
15.67%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LWCR.DE
Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc
10.71%6.71%25.11%26.79%-18.71%2.48%
CBUG.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist)
18.13%6.50%13.10%11.25%-14.07%2.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LWCR.DE and CBUG.DE is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2021

0.83

The correlation between LWCR.DE and CBUG.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LWCR.DE
LWCR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LWCR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUG.DE
CBUG.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUG.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LWCR.DECBUG.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.43

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

4.63

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.70

17.68

-4.99

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the CBUG.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LWCR.DE and CBUG.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LWCR.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, which is greater than CBUG.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LWCR.DE and CBUG.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LWCR.DECBUG.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.01%

-24.57%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-7.24%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.67%

-24.57%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

0.00%

-0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.71%

-7.41%

+2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

1.90%

-0.01%

Volatility

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) is 3.04%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 3-7yr UCITS ETF GBP hedged (Dist) (CBUG.DE) has a volatility of 3.37%. This indicates that LWCR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUG.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LWCR.DECBUG.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.04%

3.37%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.43%

10.00%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.79%

13.98%

-2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.86%

16.66%

-1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.23%

16.66%

-1.43%

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LWCR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUG.DE's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LWCR.DE vs. CBUG.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LWCR.DE nor CBUG.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


LWCR.DE and CBUG.DE have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUG.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUG.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LWCR.DE.

LWCR.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select, while CBUG.DE tracks MSCI ACWI SMID NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LWCR.DE and 0.10% for CBUG.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LWCR.DE and CBUG.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer