LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LWCR.DE (Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc) and 6AQQ.DE (Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - LWCR.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select, while 6AQQ.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq 100®. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LWCR.DE returned 22.75% vs 37.28% for 6AQQ.DE. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LWCR.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for 6AQQ.DE.

Performance

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LWCR.DE achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's 20.65% return.

LWCR.DE

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 3.86%
• YTD: 10.62%
• 6M: 10.78%
• 1Y: 22.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

6AQQ.DE

• 1D: -0.84%
• 1M: 7.97%
• YTD: 20.65%
• 6M: 18.79%
• 1Y: 37.28%
• 3Y*: 24.68%
• 5Y*: 18.87%
• 10Y*: 21.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LWCR.DE Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc	10.62%	6.71%	25.11%	2.33%
6AQQ.DE Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR	20.65%	7.08%	33.77%	3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LWCR.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 7, 2023	0.88

The correlation between LWCR.DE and 6AQQ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LWCR.DE

LWCR.DE Risk / Return Rank: 62
LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
LWCR.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
LWCR.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LWCR.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
LWCR.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 67

6AQQ.DE

6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 72
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 72
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LWCR.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	2.41	-0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.76	3.20	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.42	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.13	3.77	-0.64
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.17	11.17	+1.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LWCR.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the 6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LWCR.DE and 6AQQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LWCR.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	2.41	-0.43
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.94	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.30	1.08	+0.22

Drawdowns

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LWCR.DE drawdown since its inception was -21.67%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LWCR.DE and 6AQQ.DE.

Drawdown Indicators

	LWCR.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.67%	-31.19%	+9.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.28%	-10.01%	+2.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-26.73%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.19%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-31.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.84%	+0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-5.36%	+2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.87%	3.39%	-1.52%

Volatility

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi MSCI World ESG Climate Net Zero Ambition CTB UCITS ETF Acc (LWCR.DE) is 2.63%, while Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that LWCR.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 6AQQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LWCR.DE	6AQQ.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.63%	4.40%	-1.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.04%	10.96%	-2.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.52%	15.66%	-4.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.90%	19.83%	-5.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.90%	19.63%	-5.73%

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LWCR.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

LWCR.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LWCR.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LWCR.DE and 6AQQ.DE in my portfolio?

LWCR.DE and 6AQQ.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LWCR.DE or 6AQQ.DE?

On fees, 6AQQ.DE is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LWCR.DE or 6AQQ.DE?

6AQQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LWCR.DE.

What is the main difference between LWCR.DE and 6AQQ.DE?

LWCR.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while 6AQQ.DE is Nasdaq-100. LWCR.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Broad CTB Select, while 6AQQ.DE tracks Nasdaq 100®. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LWCR.DE and 0.23% for 6AQQ.DE.