PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE).

LVWC.DE and 6AQQ.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LVWC.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Leveraged 2x Daily Net Index. It was launched on Sep 30, 2025. 6AQQ.DE is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100®. It was launched on Apr 18, 2018. Both LVWC.DE and 6AQQ.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
LVWC.DE
Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF		-5.56%2.68%
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR		-4.21%0.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVWC.DE achieves a -5.56% return, which is significantly lower than 6AQQ.DE's -4.21% return.

LVWC.DE

1D
4.84%
1M
-7.42%
YTD
-5.56%
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

6AQQ.DE

1D
2.55%
1M
-2.46%
YTD
-4.21%
6M
-1.21%
1Y
16.23%
3Y*
20.53%
5Y*
13.54%
10Y*
18.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF

Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR

Often compared with LVWC.DE:
LVWC.DE vs. VUAA.DELVWC.DE vs. 3JPN.DELVWC.DE vs. LYMZ.DELVWC.DE vs. 18MK.DELVWC.DE vs. AUM5.DELVWC.DE vs. DBPG.DELVWC.DE vs. TAI3.DE
Often compared with 6AQQ.DE:
6AQQ.DE vs. QQQ6AQQ.DE vs. VUAA.DE6AQQ.DE vs. CNDX.L6AQQ.DE vs. EQQQ.DE6AQQ.DE vs. SPY6AQQ.DE vs. QQQ3.L6AQQ.DE vs. XLK

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVWC.DE has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than 6AQQ.DE's 0.23% expense ratio.

LVWC.DE
Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF
6AQQ.DE
Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR

Return for Risk

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
LVWC.DE
6AQQ.DE
6AQQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
6AQQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
6AQQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI World 2x Leveraged UCITS ETF (LVWC.DE) and Amundi Nasdaq 100 UCITS ETF EUR (6AQQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

LVWC.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

—

0.79

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.67

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.95

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.26

1.00

-1.26

Correlation

The correlation between LVWC.DE and 6AQQ.DE is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither LVWC.DE nor 6AQQ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVWC.DE drawdown since its inception was -14.47%, smaller than the maximum 6AQQ.DE drawdown of -31.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVWC.DE and 6AQQ.DE.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

LVWC.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.47%

-31.19%

+16.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

—

-13.37%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-31.19%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-31.19%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.41%

-7.58%

-1.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-5.40%

+1.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

—

3.42%

—

Volatility

LVWC.DE vs. 6AQQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

LVWC.DE6AQQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

—

5.00%

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

—

11.81%

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.13%

20.66%

+3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

19.84%

+4.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.13%

19.65%

+4.48%