LVOYX vs. FZAMX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

LVOYX (Lord Abbett Value Opportunities Fund) and FZAMX (Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LVOYX returned 8.24%/yr vs 12.19%/yr for FZAMX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. LVOYX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for FZAMX.

Performance

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Value Opportunities Fund (LVOYX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVOYX achieves a 11.82% return, which is significantly lower than FZAMX's 21.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LVOYX has underperformed FZAMX with an annualized return of 8.24%, while FZAMX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.19% annualized return.

LVOYX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: -1.92%
• 6M: 6.55%
• YTD: 11.82%
• 1Y: 16.01%
• 3Y*: 9.96%
• 5Y*: 4.91%
• 10Y*: 8.24%
• ALL TIME*: 9.51%

FZAMX

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -2.80%
• 6M: 15.92%
• YTD: 21.69%
• 1Y: 34.39%
• 3Y*: 17.98%
• 5Y*: 11.32%
• 10Y*: 12.19%
• ALL TIME*: 11.23%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
LVOYX Lord Abbett Value Opportunities Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LVOYX Lord Abbett Value Opportunities Fund	11.82%	0.87%	13.84%	17.03%	-21.62%	27.23%	15.54%	23.05%	-12.06%	10.18%
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	21.69%	12.00%	17.39%	15.15%	-14.70%	25.40%	18.84%	23.85%	-14.85%	20.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LVOYX and FZAMX is 0.89, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2013	0.95

The correlation between LVOYX and FZAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LVOYX vs. FZAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LVOYX

LVOYX Risk / Return Rank: 28
LVOYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
LVOYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
LVOYX Omega Ratio Rank: 24
LVOYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
LVOYX Martin Ratio Rank: 33

FZAMX

FZAMX Risk / Return Rank: 78
FZAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FZAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FZAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 68
FZAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FZAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Value Opportunities Fund (LVOYX) and Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LVOYX	FZAMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	1.75	-0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	2.47	-1.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.30	-0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.50	3.24	-1.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.10	11.76	-6.66

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVOYX Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the FZAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVOYX and FZAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVOYX drawdown since its inception was -46.13%, which is greater than FZAMX's maximum drawdown of -42.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVOYX and FZAMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVOYX	FZAMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-46.13%	-42.32%	-3.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.26%	-9.77%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.29%	-25.24%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.14%	-25.24%	-3.90%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.06%	-42.32%	+3.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-5.39%	+2.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.68%	-6.03%	-1.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.69%	+0.03%

Volatility

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lord Abbett Value Opportunities Fund (LVOYX) is 3.87%, while Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z (FZAMX) has a volatility of 4.56%. This indicates that LVOYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LVOYX	FZAMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.87%	4.56%	-0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.04%	14.46%	-3.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.92%	18.14%	-3.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.07%	20.27%	-1.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.05%	20.91%	-0.86%

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVOYX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FZAMX's 0.61% expense ratio.

Dividends

LVOYX vs. FZAMX - Dividend Comparison

LVOYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.38%, less than FZAMX's 5.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FZAMX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap II Fund Class Z	5.79%	10.09%	6.93%	2.83%	5.86%	18.58%	1.41%	3.50%	10.72%	7.81%	5.00%	4.90%
LVOYX Lord Abbett Value Opportunities Fund	5.38%	6.01%	6.65%	1.59%	9.14%	12.66%	5.41%	11.55%	10.49%	5.98%	5.82%	7.68%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LVOYX and FZAMX in my portfolio?

LVOYX and FZAMX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LVOYX or FZAMX?

FZAMX has higher volatility (4.56%) compared to LVOYX (3.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVOYX dropped -46.13% vs FZAMX's -42.32%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.