LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L
LVNG.L (RIZE Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and ARCK.L (ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - LVNG.L is a Sustainable fund tracking the Solactive RIZE ETF Environmental Impact 100 Index NTR, while ARCK.L is a Global Equities fund actively managed by ARK Invest. LVNG.L is passively managed, while ARCK.L is actively managed. Over the past year, LVNG.L returned 15.63% vs 8.77% for ARCK.L. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVNG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for ARCK.L.
Performance
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVNG.L achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly higher than ARCK.L's 6.05% return.
LVNG.L
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -4.57%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- YTD
- 9.87%
- 1Y
- 15.63%
- 3Y*
- 6.87%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCK.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.88%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 6.05%
- 1Y
- 8.77%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LVNG.L RIZE Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.87% | 16.84% | 0.33% |
ARCK.L ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 6.05% | 27.55% | 10,578.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVNG.L and ARCK.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2024 | 0.58 |
The correlation between LVNG.L and ARCK.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L — Risk / Return Rank
LVNG.L
ARCK.L
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for RIZE Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LVNG.L) and ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ARCK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVNG.L | ARCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.11 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.20 | +1.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 0.30 | +4.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVNG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum ARCK.L drawdown of -44.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVNG.L and ARCK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVNG.L | ARCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.73% | -44.34% | +21.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.73% | -44.34% | +35.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.79% | -31.09% | +24.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.91% | -16.36% | +7.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.20% | 29.14% | -25.94% |
Volatility
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for RIZE Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (LVNG.L) is 4.46%, while ARK Innovation UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (ARCK.L) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that LVNG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARCK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVNG.L | ARCK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.46% | 8.62% | -4.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 24.34% | -12.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.83% | 55.91% | -41.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 5,468.56% | -5,452.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 5,468.56% | -5,452.31% |
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than ARCK.L's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVNG.L vs. ARCK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither LVNG.L nor ARCK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LVNG.L and ARCK.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVNG.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVNG.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ARCK.L.
LVNG.L is categorized as Sustainable, while ARCK.L is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LVNG.L and 0.78% for ARCK.L.
Find the right allocation for LVNG.L and ARCK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer