LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

LVNG.L (Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF) and FOGB.L (Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD) are both exchange-traded funds - LVNG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF, while FOGB.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LVNG.L returned 7.40%/yr vs -5.08%/yr for FOGB.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVNG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FOGB.L.

Performance

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LVNG.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVNG.L achieves a 10.06% return, which is significantly higher than FOGB.L's 3.33% return.

LVNG.L

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -4.14%
• 6M: 5.40%
• YTD: 10.06%
• 1Y: 16.17%
• 3Y*: 7.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FOGB.L

• 1D: -0.47%
• 1M: 0.62%
• 6M: -1.77%
• YTD: 3.33%
• 1Y: -4.66%
• 3Y*: -5.08%
• 5Y*: -8.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LVNG.L Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF	10.06%	16.84%	-2.32%	8.72%	-11.14%	6.07%
FOGB.L Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD	3.33%	-9.49%	-5.72%	-6.98%	-18.26%	-5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LVNG.L and FOGB.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.66
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2021	0.73

The correlation between LVNG.L and FOGB.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVNG.L

LVNG.L Risk / Return Rank: 42
LVNG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
LVNG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
LVNG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 36
LVNG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
LVNG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 43

FOGB.L

FOGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 7
FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
FOGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
FOGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FOGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
FOGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LVNG.L) and Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LVNG.L	FOGB.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.20	-0.21	+1.42
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.73	-0.19	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.98	+0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.04	-0.25	+2.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.63	-0.41	+6.04

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVNG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the FOGB.L Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVNG.L and FOGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVNG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.73%, smaller than the maximum FOGB.L drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVNG.L and FOGB.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVNG.L	FOGB.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.73%	-43.46%	+20.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.73%	-12.73%	+4.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.05%	-23.44%	+6.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.63%	-38.99%	+32.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.91%	-24.51%	+15.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.17%	7.79%	-4.62%

Volatility

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Volatility Comparison

Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF (LVNG.L) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD (FOGB.L) at 4.25%. This indicates that LVNG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LVNG.L	FOGB.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.50%	4.25%	+0.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.77%	11.01%	+0.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.91%	15.10%	-0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.25%	15.83%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.25%	15.43%	+0.82%

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVNG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FOGB.L's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

LVNG.L vs. FOGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither LVNG.L nor FOGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LVNG.L and FOGB.L in my portfolio?

LVNG.L and FOGB.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LVNG.L or FOGB.L?

On fees, FOGB.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LVNG.L or FOGB.L?

FOGB.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for LVNG.L.

What is the main difference between LVNG.L and FOGB.L?

LVNG.L is categorized as Global Equities, while FOGB.L is Technology Equities. LVNG.L tracks Rize Environmental Impact 100 UCITS ETF, while FOGB.L tracks Rize Sustainable Future of Food UCITS ETF A USD. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for LVNG.L and 0.45% for FOGB.L.