PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. SCHO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. SCHO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than SCHO's 0.58% return.


LVHI

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.03%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.70%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*

SCHO

1D
0.04%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.47%
3Y*
4.27%
5Y*
1.86%
10Y*
1.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. SCHO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.06%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.58%5.49%3.65%4.31%-3.87%-0.64%3.11%3.47%1.37%0.33%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and SCHO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

-0.08

The correlation between LVHI and SCHO shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (all time) to 0.14 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. SCHO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHO
SCHO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SCHO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. SCHO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHISCHODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.71

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.52

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

4.06

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.39

17.10

+4.29

LVHI vs. SCHO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is comparable to the SCHO Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and SCHO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. SCHO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than SCHO's maximum drawdown of -5.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and SCHO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHISCHODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-5.69%

-26.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-0.86%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-0.98%

-11.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-5.69%

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.10%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-0.61%

-2.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.20%

+1.27%

Volatility

LVHI vs. SCHO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHO) at 0.43%. This indicates that LVHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHISCHODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

0.43%

+2.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

0.93%

+6.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

1.36%

+8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

1.98%

+9.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

1.56%

+12.19%

LVHI vs. SCHO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHO's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. SCHO - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than SCHO's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.72%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%
SCHO
Schwab Short-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
3.90%4.06%4.29%3.76%1.34%0.41%1.27%2.27%1.60%1.12%0.82%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and SCHO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHI has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to SCHO (0.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs SCHO's -5.69%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 1.86% for SCHO. On fees, SCHO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SCHO has been the lower-risk option at 0.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 1.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.

LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.72%, compared with 3.90% for SCHO.

LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while SCHO is Government Bonds. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while SCHO tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury 1-3 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.03% for SCHO.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and SCHO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer