LVHI vs. PBDC
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and PBDC (Putnam BDC Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Dividend fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while PBDC is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. LVHI is passively managed, while PBDC is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LVHI returned 22.77%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for PBDC. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 13.49%/yr for PBDC.
Performance
LVHI vs. PBDC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 18.07% return, which is significantly higher than PBDC's -6.86% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 3.87%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- YTD
- 18.07%
- 1Y
- 35.95%
- 3Y*
- 22.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.64%
- 10Y*
- 11.79%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.64%
PBDC
- 1D
- 2.58%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- 6M
- -3.75%
- YTD
- -6.86%
- 1Y
- -10.01%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $35.67M | $30.40M | $26.81M | |
| $3.20M | $3.19M | $3.74M |
LVHI vs. PBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 18.07% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 10.03% |
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF | -6.86% | -1.77% | 19.43% | 30.52% | 10.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and PBDC is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2022 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LVHI and PBDC has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. PBDC — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
PBDC
LVHI vs. PBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +4.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.75 | 0.93 | +0.82 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.94 | -0.57 | +6.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.81 | -0.97 | +25.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. PBDC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than PBDC's maximum drawdown of -20.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and PBDC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -20.47% | -11.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -17.71% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -20.47% | +8.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.88% | -14.56% | +13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.47% | -5.17% | +1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 10.35% | -8.90% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. PBDC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.09%, while Putnam BDC Income ETF (PBDC) has a volatility of 5.07%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBDC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | PBDC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 5.07% | -2.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 15.41% | -7.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.35% | 19.06% | -9.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 17.04% | -5.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.70% | 17.04% | -3.34% |
LVHI vs. PBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PBDC's 13.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. PBDC - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.52%, less than PBDC's 11.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.52% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
PBDC Putnam BDC Income ETF | 11.29% | 10.53% | 9.29% | 9.86% | 3.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and PBDC have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PBDC has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to LVHI (2.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs PBDC's -20.47%.
On 3-year performance, LVHI leads with 22.77% vs 5.49% for PBDC. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 22.77% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 13.49% for PBDC.
PBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.29%, compared with 4.52% for LVHI.
LVHI is categorized as Dividend, while PBDC is Financials Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 13.49% for PBDC.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.87 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and PBDC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer