LVHI vs. MOAT
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and MOAT (VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while MOAT is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 16.27%/yr vs 8.54%/yr for MOAT. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for MOAT.
Performance
LVHI vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's 2.49% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 11.66%
- YTD
- 15.24%
- 1Y
- 33.06%
- 3Y*
- 21.25%
- 5Y*
- 16.27%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.42%
MOAT
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- YTD
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 11.94%
- 3Y*
- 10.06%
- 5Y*
- 8.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.39%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.70%
LVHI vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 15.24% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 2.49% | 13.20% | 10.73% | 31.89% | -13.66% | 24.12% | 14.84% | 34.79% | -1.28% | 23.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and MOAT is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016 | 0.55 |
The correlation between LVHI and MOAT shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (1 year) to 0.57 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. MOAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
MOAT
Financial Services
Energy
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
MOAT
Energy
LVHI
MOAT
-
Industrials
LVHI
MOAT
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
MOAT
Utilities
LVHI
MOAT
-
Healthcare
LVHI
MOAT
Basic Materials
LVHI
MOAT
-
Communication Services
LVHI
MOAT
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
MOAT
Real Estate
LVHI
MOAT
Technology
LVHI
MOAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
MOAT
LVHI vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVHI | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.67 | 1.15 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.47 | 0.97 | +4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 22.51 | 2.86 | +19.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and MOAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -33.31% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -12.43% | +6.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -21.44% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -23.96% | +11.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.50% | -1.42% | +0.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.48% | -3.82% | +0.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 4.18% | -2.71% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.14%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | MOAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 3.60% | -1.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.66% | 10.40% | -2.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.58% | 13.95% | -4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.04% | 18.26% | -7.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.71% | 18.61% | -4.90% |
LVHI vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.63%, more than MOAT's 1.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.63% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF | 1.32% | 1.36% | 1.37% | 0.86% | 1.25% | 1.08% | 1.46% | 1.31% | 1.79% | 1.07% | 1.17% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and MOAT have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MOAT has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to LVHI (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs MOAT's -33.31%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 16.27% vs 8.54% for MOAT. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 16.27% return vs 8.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.63%, compared with 1.32% for MOAT.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.47% for MOAT.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.47 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and MOAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer