PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVHI vs. HYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVHI vs. HYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 13.06% return, which is significantly higher than HYG's 1.78% return.


LVHI

1D
-0.63%
1M
1.03%
YTD
13.06%
6M
13.70%
1Y
31.29%
3Y*
21.07%
5Y*
15.66%
10Y*

HYG

1D
0.13%
1M
1.25%
YTD
1.78%
6M
2.29%
1Y
6.95%
3Y*
8.47%
5Y*
3.83%
10Y*
5.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVHI vs. HYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
13.06%27.12%14.81%17.45%3.84%18.19%-8.76%18.35%-5.22%12.26%
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
1.78%8.59%7.97%11.54%-10.98%3.76%4.47%14.09%-2.02%6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between LVHI and HYG is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2016

0.49

The correlation between LVHI and HYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVHI vs. HYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVHI
LVHI Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
LVHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LVHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LVHI Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
LVHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
LVHI Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HYG
HYG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
HYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYG Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVHI vs. HYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LVHIHYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

1.35

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.17

2.98

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.39

13.11

+8.28

LVHI vs. HYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LVHI Sharpe Ratio is 3.27, which is higher than the HYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LVHI and HYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LVHI vs. HYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum HYG drawdown of -34.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and HYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVHIHYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.31%

-34.25%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.08%

-2.34%

-3.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.99%

-4.56%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.99%

-15.79%

+3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

0.00%

-0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.51%

-3.24%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.53%

+0.94%

Volatility

LVHI vs. HYG - Volatility Comparison

Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (HYG) at 1.31%. This indicates that LVHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVHIHYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.83%

1.31%

+1.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

3.08%

+4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.63%

3.87%

+5.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.09%

7.53%

+3.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.75%

8.29%

+5.46%

LVHI vs. HYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than HYG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVHI vs. HYG - Dividend Comparison

LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than HYG's 5.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HYG
iShares iBoxx $ High Yield Corporate Bond ETF
5.89%5.71%6.01%5.74%5.30%4.02%4.88%4.99%5.54%5.12%5.27%5.90%
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
4.72%4.92%3.98%8.12%7.74%4.13%3.97%6.67%10.67%3.38%2.02%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVHI and HYG have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LVHI has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to HYG (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs HYG's -34.25%.

On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.66% vs 3.83% for HYG. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, HYG has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.66% return vs 3.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for HYG.

HYG has the higher dividend yield at 5.89%, compared with 4.72% for LVHI.

LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while HYG is High Yield Bonds. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while HYG tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid High Yield Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.49% for HYG.

LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVHI and HYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer