LVHI vs. FLLV
LVHI (Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) and FLLV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds from Franklin Templeton. LVHI is passively managed, while FLLV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.80%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for FLLV. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLLV.
Performance
LVHI vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 13.91% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FLLV
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 13.91%
- 6M
- 16.10%
- 1Y
- 28.82%
- 3Y*
- 17.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.45%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 11.71% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 13.91% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and FLLV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.55 |
The correlation between LVHI and FLLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
LVHI vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
FLLV
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
FLLV
Energy
LVHI
FLLV
Industrials
LVHI
FLLV
Utilities
LVHI
FLLV
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
FLLV
Healthcare
LVHI
FLLV
Basic Materials
LVHI
FLLV
Communication Services
LVHI
FLLV
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
FLLV
Real Estate
LVHI
FLLV
Technology
LVHI
FLLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
FLLV
LVHI vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.19 | 3.50 | -0.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.37 | 5.08 | -0.72 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.66 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 5.94 | -0.99 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.63 | 22.48 | -1.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 3.50 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.44 | 0.87 | +0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.84 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, roughly equal to the maximum FLLV drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and FLLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -33.95% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -4.90% | -1.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -14.01% | +2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -18.40% | +6.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | 0.00% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -3.25% | -0.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 1.29% | +0.17% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) at 1.97%. This indicates that LVHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 1.97% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.50% | 5.92% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.45% | 8.28% | +1.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 13.26% | -2.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 15.69% | -1.93% |
LVHI vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than FLLV's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 4.70% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% |
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 4.50% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and FLLV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to FLLV (1.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs FLLV's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.80% vs 11.45% for FLLV. On fees, FLLV is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 11.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLLV is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LVHI.
FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.50% for LVHI.
Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.29% for FLLV.
FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 3.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and FLLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer