LVHI vs. FLBL
LVHI (Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF) and FLBL (Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the QS International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index, while FLBL is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. LVHI is passively managed, while FLBL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.80%/yr vs 5.21%/yr for FLBL. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for FLBL.
Performance
LVHI vs. FLBL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.71% return, which is significantly higher than FLBL's 0.91% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.49%
- YTD
- 11.71%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 29.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.91%
- 5Y*
- 15.80%
- 10Y*
- —
FLBL
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 0.70%
- 1Y
- 2.39%
- 3Y*
- 7.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.21%
- 10Y*
- —
LVHI vs. FLBL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 11.71% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -2.34% |
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF | 0.91% | 3.59% | 8.26% | 14.83% | -2.69% | 4.35% | 2.17% | 7.67% | -1.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and FLBL is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2018 | 0.31 |
The correlation between LVHI and FLBL shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.33 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. FLBL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
FLBL
Financial Services
Energy
-
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
LVHI
FLBL
Energy
LVHI
FLBL
-
Industrials
LVHI
FLBL
Utilities
LVHI
FLBL
-
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
FLBL
-
Healthcare
LVHI
FLBL
Basic Materials
LVHI
FLBL
-
Communication Services
LVHI
FLBL
-
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
FLBL
Real Estate
LVHI
FLBL
-
Technology
LVHI
FLBL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. FLBL — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
FLBL
LVHI vs. FLBL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) and Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.19 | 0.92 | +2.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.37 | 1.31 | +3.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.18 | +0.42 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.95 | 0.75 | +4.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.63 | 2.54 | +18.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 0.92 | +2.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.44 | 1.36 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.80 | +0.02 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. FLBL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, which is greater than FLBL's maximum drawdown of -19.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and FLBL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -19.52% | -12.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -3.18% | -2.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -3.91% | -8.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -6.80% | -5.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.56% | -0.09% | -1.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -1.00% | -2.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 0.94% | +0.52% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. FLBL - Volatility Comparison
Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF (LVHI) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF (FLBL) at 0.65%. This indicates that LVHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLBL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | FLBL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 0.65% | +2.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.50% | 2.23% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.45% | 2.60% | +6.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 3.86% | +7.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 5.72% | +8.04% |
LVHI vs. FLBL - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FLBL's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. FLBL - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.50%, less than FLBL's 7.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLBL Franklin Liberty Senior Loan ETF | 7.58% | 7.24% | 8.05% | 8.37% | 5.53% | 3.57% | 3.22% | 3.97% | 2.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LVHI Legg Mason International Low Volatility High Dividend ETF | 4.50% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and FLBL have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LVHI has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to FLBL (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs FLBL's -19.52%.
On 5-year performance, LVHI leads with 15.80% vs 5.21% for FLBL. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FLBL has been the lower-risk option at 0.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LVHI has performed better with a 15.80% return vs 5.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FLBL.
FLBL has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 4.50% for LVHI.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while FLBL is High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.45% for FLBL.
LVHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and FLBL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer