LVHI vs. EWY
LVHI (Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF) and EWY (iShares MSCI South Korea ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVHI is a Volatility Hedged Equity fund tracking the Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while EWY is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Korea Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, LVHI returned 15.67%/yr vs 17.62%/yr for EWY. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVHI charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for EWY.
Performance
LVHI vs. EWY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVHI achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly lower than EWY's 90.95% return.
LVHI
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 11.45%
- 6M
- 13.55%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 20.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
EWY
- 1D
- 5.96%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 90.95%
- 6M
- 99.65%
- 1Y
- 189.48%
- 3Y*
- 44.08%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 15.79%
LVHI vs. EWY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 11.45% | 27.12% | 14.81% | 17.45% | 3.84% | 18.19% | -8.76% | 18.35% | -5.22% | 12.26% |
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 90.95% | 95.33% | -20.48% | 19.05% | -26.59% | -7.58% | 39.43% | 7.97% | -20.37% | 44.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVHI and EWY is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016 | 0.43 |
The correlation between LVHI and EWY shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
LVHI vs. EWY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVHI
EWY
Financial Services
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
-
Technology
Financial Services
LVHI
EWY
Energy
LVHI
EWY
Industrials
LVHI
EWY
Utilities
LVHI
EWY
Consumer Defensive
LVHI
EWY
Healthcare
LVHI
EWY
Basic Materials
LVHI
EWY
Communication Services
LVHI
EWY
Consumer Cyclical
LVHI
EWY
Real Estate
LVHI
EWY
-
Technology
LVHI
EWY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVHI vs. EWY — Risk / Return Rank
LVHI
EWY
LVHI vs. EWY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) and iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LVHI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.58 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.84 | 8.26 | -3.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.99 | 29.84 | -9.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVHI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.10 | 4.23 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.42 | 0.60 | +0.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 0.31 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
LVHI vs. EWY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVHI drawdown since its inception was -32.31%, smaller than the maximum EWY drawdown of -74.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVHI and EWY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVHI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.31% | -74.14% | +41.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.08% | -23.08% | +17.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.99% | -27.36% | +15.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.99% | -48.55% | +36.56% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.73% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -14.33% | +12.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.52% | -20.12% | +16.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 6.38% | -4.91% |
Volatility
LVHI vs. EWY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF (LVHI) is 2.35%, while iShares MSCI South Korea ETF (EWY) has a volatility of 25.98%. This indicates that LVHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EWY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVHI | EWY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | 25.98% | -23.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.58% | 41.23% | -33.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.50% | 45.13% | -35.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.07% | 29.70% | -18.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 27.83% | -14.07% |
LVHI vs. EWY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVHI has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than EWY's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVHI vs. EWY - Dividend Comparison
LVHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than EWY's 1.10% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWY iShares MSCI South Korea ETF | 1.10% | 2.10% | 2.55% | 2.52% | 1.23% | 2.16% | 0.73% | 2.10% | 1.34% | 2.90% | 1.21% | 2.42% |
LVHI Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF | 4.79% | 4.92% | 3.98% | 8.12% | 7.74% | 4.13% | 3.97% | 6.67% | 10.67% | 3.38% | 2.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVHI and EWY have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EWY has higher volatility (25.98%) compared to LVHI (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LVHI dropped -32.31% vs EWY's -74.14%.
On 5-year performance, EWY leads with 17.62% vs 15.67% for LVHI. On fees, LVHI is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LVHI has been the lower-risk option at 2.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, EWY has performed better with a 17.62% return vs 15.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LVHI is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EWY.
LVHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.79%, compared with 1.10% for EWY.
LVHI is categorized as Volatility Hedged Equity, while EWY is Asia Pacific Equities. LVHI tracks Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index-NR, while EWY tracks MSCI Korea Index. They also come from different issuers: Franklin Templeton and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LVHI and 0.59% for EWY.
EWY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 3.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LVHI and EWY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer