LVDS vs. JCPB
LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVDS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for JCPB.
Performance
LVDS vs. JCPB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 15.33% return, which is significantly higher than JCPB's 1.31% return.
LVDS
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 2.91%
- YTD
- 15.33%
- 6M
- 14.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JCPB
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 1.31%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 5.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.32%
- 5Y*
- 1.21%
- 10Y*
- —
LVDS vs. JCPB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 15.33% | 7.40% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 1.31% | 4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVDS and JCPB is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVDS vs. JCPB — Risk / Return Rank
LVDS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
JCPB
LVDS vs. JCPB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LVDS | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.99 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 5.73 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LVDS vs. JCPB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum JCPB drawdown of -16.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and JCPB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVDS | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -16.67% | +10.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -16.67% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -0.76% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.95% | -4.24% | +3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.94% | — |
Volatility
LVDS vs. JCPB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVDS | JCPB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 1.13% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.85% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.62% | 3.74% | +6.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 5.40% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.62% | 5.04% | +5.58% |
LVDS vs. JCPB - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JCPB's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVDS vs. JCPB - Dividend Comparison
LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.80%, more than JCPB's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.89% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.80% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVDS and JCPB have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.80%, compared with 4.89% for JCPB.
LVDS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JCPB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.38% for JCPB.
Find the right allocation for LVDS and JCPB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer