PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LVDS vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LVDS vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 25.73% return.


LVDS

1D
0.18%
1M
3.85%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FAAR

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.79%
YTD
25.73%
6M
23.17%
1Y
40.73%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
5.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVDS vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LVDS and FAAR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025

-0.03

LVDS vs. FAAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LVDS
FAAR

Financial Services

18.3%
100.0%

Technology

15.9%

-

Industrials

10.2%

-

Healthcare

8.6%

-

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%

-

Communication Services

7.5%

-

Energy

6.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.5%

-

Utilities

4.8%

-

Real Estate

4.2%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Financial Services

LVDS
18.3%
FAAR
100.0%

Technology

LVDS
15.9%
FAAR

-

Industrials

LVDS
10.2%
FAAR

-

Healthcare

LVDS
8.6%
FAAR

-

Consumer Cyclical

LVDS
8.0%
FAAR

-

Communication Services

LVDS
7.5%
FAAR

-

Energy

LVDS
6.6%
FAAR

-

Consumer Defensive

LVDS
6.5%
FAAR

-

Utilities

LVDS
4.8%
FAAR

-

Real Estate

LVDS
4.2%
FAAR

-

Basic Materials

LVDS
1.7%
FAAR

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LVDS vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LVDS

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVDS vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LVDS vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LVDSFAARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.39

0.45

+1.94

Drawdowns

LVDS vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LVDSFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-18.03%

+11.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.11%

+1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-7.85%

+6.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.73%

Volatility

LVDS vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LVDSFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.43%

13.48%

-3.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.43%

13.02%

-2.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.43%

11.51%

-1.08%

LVDS vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LVDS vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, less than FAAR's 9.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.15%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
LVDS
JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF
7.56%8.25%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LVDS and FAAR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 7.56% for LVDS.

LVDS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.95% for FAAR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LVDS and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer