LVDS vs. FAAR
LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and FAAR (First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LVDS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FAAR is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FAAR.
Performance
LVDS vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 25.73% return.
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAAR
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.79%
- YTD
- 25.73%
- 6M
- 23.17%
- 1Y
- 40.73%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 8.07%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
LVDS vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 13.56% | 7.24% |
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 25.73% | 5.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between LVDS and FAAR is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.03 |
LVDS vs. FAAR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LVDS
FAAR
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
LVDS
FAAR
Technology
LVDS
FAAR
-
Industrials
LVDS
FAAR
-
Healthcare
LVDS
FAAR
-
Consumer Cyclical
LVDS
FAAR
-
Communication Services
LVDS
FAAR
-
Energy
LVDS
FAAR
-
Consumer Defensive
LVDS
FAAR
-
Utilities
LVDS
FAAR
-
Real Estate
LVDS
FAAR
-
Basic Materials
LVDS
FAAR
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LVDS vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank
LVDS
FAAR
LVDS vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LVDS | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.39 | 0.45 | +1.94 |
Drawdowns
LVDS vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, smaller than the maximum FAAR drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and FAAR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LVDS | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.64% | -18.03% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.54% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.11% | +1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.98% | -7.85% | +6.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.73% | — |
Volatility
LVDS vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LVDS | FAAR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.44% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.72% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.43% | 13.48% | -3.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 13.02% | -2.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 11.51% | -1.08% |
LVDS vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
LVDS vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison
LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, less than FAAR's 9.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAAR First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF | 9.15% | 11.63% | 3.45% | 3.20% | 5.82% | 6.49% | 3.05% | 1.02% | 0.58% | 2.83% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.56% | 8.25% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LVDS and FAAR have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.
FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.15%, compared with 7.56% for LVDS.
LVDS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.95% for FAAR.
Find the right allocation for LVDS and FAAR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer