LVDS vs. BILZ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) and BILZ (PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LVDS is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while BILZ is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. LVDS charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for BILZ.

Performance

LVDS vs. BILZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LVDS achieves a 13.56% return, which is significantly higher than BILZ's 1.47% return.

LVDS

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.85%
• YTD: 13.56%
• 6M: 14.52%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BILZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 1.47%
• 6M: 1.76%
• 1Y: 3.91%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LVDS vs. BILZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	13.56%	7.24%
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	1.47%	1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between LVDS and BILZ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025	-0.03

Return for Risk

LVDS vs. BILZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BILZ

BILZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
BILZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
BILZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LVDS vs. BILZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS) and PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund (BILZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LVDS	BILZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	19.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.39	10.48	-8.10

Drawdowns

LVDS vs. BILZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LVDS drawdown since its inception was -6.64%, which is greater than BILZ's maximum drawdown of -0.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LVDS and BILZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	LVDS	BILZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.64%	-0.52%	-6.12%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.98%	-0.01%	-0.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LVDS	BILZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.07%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.14%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.43%	0.21%	+10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.43%	0.43%	+10.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	0.43%	+10.00%

LVDS vs. BILZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

LVDS has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BILZ's 0.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

LVDS vs. BILZ - Dividend Comparison

LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than BILZ's 4.07% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
BILZ PIMCO Ultra Short Government Active Exchange-Traded Fund	4.07%	4.19%	4.95%	2.23%
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF	7.56%	8.25%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LVDS and BILZ in my portfolio?

LVDS and BILZ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LVDS or BILZ?

On fees, BILZ is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LVDS or BILZ?

BILZ is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for LVDS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LVDS or BILZ?

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 4.07% for BILZ.

What is the main difference between LVDS and BILZ?

LVDS is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BILZ is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for LVDS and 0.14% for BILZ.