PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUV vs. SHV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LUV vs. SHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUV achieves a 20.59% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LUV has outperformed SHV with an annualized return of 3.84%, while SHV has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.


LUV

1D
1.73%
1M
21.45%
YTD
20.59%
6M
20.45%
1Y
57.90%
3Y*
15.83%
5Y*
-0.40%
10Y*
3.84%

SHV

1D
0.02%
1M
0.26%
YTD
1.60%
6M
1.70%
1Y
3.83%
3Y*
4.61%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
2.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUV vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
20.59%25.62%19.11%-11.82%-21.41%-8.09%-13.32%17.72%-28.21%32.40%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
1.60%4.21%5.12%5.04%0.94%-0.10%0.81%2.36%1.72%0.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LUV and SHV is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2007

-0.06

The correlation between LUV and SHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUV vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUV
LUV Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
LUV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LUV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

SHV
SHV Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
SHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHV Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
SHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHV Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUV vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUVSHVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-17.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-95.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

35.59

-34.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

141.48

-139.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.44

1,585.41

-1,581.97

LUV vs. SHV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUV Sharpe Ratio is 1.29, which is lower than the SHV Sharpe Ratio of 18.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUV and SHV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUV vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUV drawdown since its inception was -78.25%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUV and SHV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUVSHVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.25%

-0.45%

-77.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.49%

-0.03%

-33.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.93%

-0.03%

-42.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-58.75%

-0.38%

-58.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.76%

-0.45%

-64.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.88%

0.00%

-16.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.13%

-0.03%

-29.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.88%

0.00%

+16.88%

Volatility

LUV vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison

Southwest Airlines Co. (LUV) has a higher volatility of 12.52% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.07%. This indicates that LUV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUVSHVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.52%

0.07%

+12.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.29%

0.13%

+35.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.25%

0.21%

+45.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.52%

0.29%

+38.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.73%

0.28%

+37.45%

Dividends

LUV vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison

LUV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than SHV's 3.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LUV
Southwest Airlines Co.
1.46%1.74%2.14%3.12%0.00%0.00%0.39%1.30%1.30%0.73%0.75%0.66%
SHV
iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.83%4.09%5.02%4.73%1.39%0.00%0.74%2.19%1.66%0.72%0.34%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


LUV and SHV have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUV has higher volatility (12.52%) compared to SHV (0.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUV dropped -78.25% vs SHV's -0.45%.

SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (18.56 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUV and SHV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer