LUNR vs. VWRD.L

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) is a stock, while VWRD.L (Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF) is Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Over the past 3 years, LUNR returned 42.24%/yr vs 19.78%/yr for VWRD.L. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LUNR vs. VWRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than VWRD.L's 10.27% return.

LUNR

• 1D: -13.12%
• 1M: -25.39%
• YTD: 64.02%
• 6M: 122.39%
• 1Y: 144.44%
• 3Y*: 42.24%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VWRD.L

• 1D: 2.38%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 10.27%
• 6M: 11.90%
• 1Y: 25.73%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 10.91%
• 10Y*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNR vs. VWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	64.02%	-10.63%	610.76%	-74.45%	3.73%	-0.10%
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF	10.27%	22.39%	17.65%	22.31%	-18.19%	-0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and VWRD.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021	0.19

Return for Risk

LUNR vs. VWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNR

LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 81
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 77
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 83

VWRD.L

VWRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 72
VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
VWRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
VWRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
VWRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VWRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNR vs. VWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LUNR	VWRD.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.31	2.01	-0.70
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	3.00	-0.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.37	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	2.91	+0.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.12	11.88	-4.76

LUNR vs. VWRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is lower than the VWRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and VWRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. VWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than VWRD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and VWRD.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	LUNR	VWRD.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-97.43%	-33.83%	-63.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-41.94%	-8.80%	-33.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.54%	-16.25%	-62.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-26.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.53%	-1.99%	-65.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.21%	-4.51%	-58.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	20.37%	2.16%	+18.21%

Volatility

LUNR vs. VWRD.L - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRD.L) at 4.40%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VWRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LUNR	VWRD.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	42.95%	4.40%	+38.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	93.42%	10.29%	+83.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	111.16%	12.77%	+98.39%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	171.29%	15.38%	+155.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	171.29%	15.73%	+155.56%

Dividends

LUNR vs. VWRD.L - Dividend Comparison

LUNR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VWRD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VWRD.L Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF	1.25%	1.38%	1.52%	1.69%	2.05%	1.48%	1.47%	1.88%	2.29%	1.82%	2.04%	2.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LUNR and VWRD.L in my portfolio?

LUNR and VWRD.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.