PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNR vs. FUBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUNR vs. FUBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) and fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a -23.97% return, which is significantly higher than FUBO's -70.73% return.


LUNR

1D
0.73%
1M
-36.98%
6M
-35.02%
YTD
-23.97%
1Y
16.31%
3Y*
15.02%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.37%

FUBO

1D
3.03%
1M
-13.24%
6M
-66.93%
YTD
-70.73%
1Y
-80.33%
3Y*
-39.38%
5Y*
-50.97%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-25.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.07M$12.31M$14.12M
$108.37M$133.78M$360.74M

LUNR vs. FUBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LUNR
Intuitive Machines, Inc.
-23.97%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%
FUBO
fuboTV Inc.
-70.73%100.00%-60.38%82.76%-88.79%-35.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and FUBO is 0.25, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021

0.18

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LUNR:

$1.97B

FUBO:

$968.13M

EPS

LUNR:

-$0.00

FUBO:

-$1.30

PS Ratio

LUNR:

1.82K

FUBO:

0.07

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUNR:

$334.27M

FUBO:

$3.88B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUNR:

$85.92M

FUBO:

$233.58M

EBITDA (TTM)

LUNR:

-$96.76M

FUBO:

$35.16M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNR vs. FUBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FUBO
FUBO Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FUBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUBO Omega Ratio Rank: 22
Omega Ratio Rank
FUBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUBO Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LUNR vs. FUBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) and fuboTV Inc. (FUBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LUNRFUBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

0.71

+0.40

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.14

-0.96

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.37

-1.39

+1.75

LUNR vs. FUBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.10, which is higher than the FUBO Sharpe Ratio of -1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and FUBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. FUBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum FUBO drawdown of -98.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and FUBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNRFUBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-98.99%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.08%

-85.22%

+10.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-76.91%

-87.65%

+10.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-98.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.95%

-98.89%

+13.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.66%

-85.79%

+22.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.88%

58.78%

-29.90%

Volatility

LUNR vs. FUBO - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 20.62% compared to fuboTV Inc. (FUBO) at 17.25%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNRFUBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.62%

17.25%

+3.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

84.90%

64.56%

+20.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

110.95%

75.00%

+35.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

169.44%

144.90%

+24.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

169.44%

170.10%

-0.66%

Dividends

LUNR vs. FUBO - Dividend Comparison

Neither LUNR nor FUBO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LUNR vs. FUBO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines, Inc. and fuboTV Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LUNR vs. FUBO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intuitive Machines, Inc. and fuboTV Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

FUBO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

FUBO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Intuitive Machines, Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.

FUBO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, fuboTV Inc. reported a net income of -5.52M and revenue of 1.57B, resulting in a net margin of -0.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUNR and FUBO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (20.62%) compared to FUBO (17.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs FUBO's -98.99%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.10 vs -1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNR and FUBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer