LUNR vs. EOSE
LUNR (Intuitive Machines Inc. ) and EOSE (Eos Energy Enterprises Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — LUNR in Aerospace & Defense, EOSE in Electrical Equipment & Parts. Over the past 3 years, LUNR returned 42.24%/yr vs 23.72%/yr for EOSE. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LUNR vs. EOSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 64.02% return, which is significantly higher than EOSE's -47.12% return.
LUNR
- 1D
- -13.12%
- 1M
- -25.39%
- YTD
- 64.02%
- 6M
- 122.39%
- 1Y
- 144.44%
- 3Y*
- 42.24%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EOSE
- 1D
- -2.26%
- 1M
- -26.81%
- YTD
- -47.12%
- 6M
- -59.16%
- 1Y
- 45.67%
- 3Y*
- 23.72%
- 5Y*
- -21.15%
- 10Y*
- —
LUNR vs. EOSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LUNR Intuitive Machines Inc. | 64.02% | -10.63% | 610.76% | -74.45% | 3.73% | -0.10% |
EOSE Eos Energy Enterprises Inc | -47.12% | 135.80% | 345.87% | -26.35% | -80.32% | -31.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between LUNR and EOSE is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2021 | 0.20 |
Over the past year, LUNR and EOSE have become more correlated (0.47) than their long-term average of 0.20, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
LUNR:
$3.94T
EOSE:
$3.30B
LUNR:
-$0.00
EOSE:
-$1.45
LUNR:
2.95K
EOSE:
12.40
LUNR:
$334.27M
EOSE:
$160.71M
LUNR:
$85.92M
EOSE:
-$163.73M
LUNR:
-$96.76M
EOSE:
-$858.77M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LUNR vs. EOSE — Risk / Return Rank
LUNR
EOSE
LUNR vs. EOSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LUNR | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.17 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.47 | 0.60 | +2.87 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 1.16 | +5.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LUNR vs. EOSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, roughly equal to the maximum EOSE drawdown of -97.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and EOSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LUNR | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.43% | -97.88% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.94% | -77.10% | +35.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -78.54% | -87.18% | +8.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -96.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.53% | -80.09% | +12.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -63.21% | -72.37% | +9.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.37% | 39.66% | -19.29% |
Volatility
LUNR vs. EOSE - Volatility Comparison
Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 42.95% compared to Eos Energy Enterprises Inc (EOSE) at 31.08%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EOSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LUNR | EOSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 42.95% | 31.08% | +11.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 93.42% | 91.90% | +1.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 111.16% | 115.13% | -3.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 117.06% | +54.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 171.29% | 112.92% | +58.37% |
Dividends
LUNR vs. EOSE - Dividend Comparison
Neither LUNR nor EOSE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LUNR vs. EOSE - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and Eos Energy Enterprises Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LUNR and EOSE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LUNR has higher volatility (42.95%) compared to EOSE (31.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs EOSE's -97.88%.
LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.31 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LUNR and EOSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer