PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LUNR vs. DKNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LUNR vs. DKNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LUNR achieves a 83.21% return, which is significantly higher than DKNG's -28.09% return.


LUNR

1D
1.28%
1M
2.64%
YTD
83.21%
6M
155.67%
1Y
153.93%
3Y*
50.12%
5Y*
10Y*

DKNG

1D
-0.60%
1M
-2.90%
YTD
-28.09%
6M
-30.31%
1Y
-30.80%
3Y*
-0.21%
5Y*
-14.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LUNR vs. DKNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LUNR
Intuitive Machines Inc.
83.21%-10.63%610.76%-74.45%3.73%-0.10%
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
-28.09%-7.37%5.53%209.48%-58.54%-27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between LUNR and DKNG is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2021

0.13

Fundamentals

EPS

LUNR:

-$0.00

DKNG:

$0.15

PS Ratio

LUNR:

3.30K

DKNG:

1.57

Total Revenue (TTM)

LUNR:

$334.27M

DKNG:

$6.29B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LUNR:

$85.92M

DKNG:

$2.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

LUNR:

-$96.76M

DKNG:

$319.39M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LUNR vs. DKNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LUNR
LUNR Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
LUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

DKNG
DKNG Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
DKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
DKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
DKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
DKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LUNR vs. DKNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) and DraftKings Inc. (DKNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LUNRDKNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

0.91

+0.37

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

-0.54

+4.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.75

-0.88

+8.63

LUNR vs. DKNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LUNR Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the DKNG Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LUNR and DKNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LUNRDKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

-0.67

+2.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.07

+0.10

Drawdowns

LUNR vs. DKNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LUNR drawdown since its inception was -97.43%, which is greater than DKNG's maximum drawdown of -85.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LUNR and DKNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LUNRDKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.43%

-85.73%

-11.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.88%

-57.04%

+15.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-78.54%

-61.26%

-17.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.73%

-65.57%

+1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.26%

-48.94%

-14.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.93%

35.07%

-15.14%

Volatility

LUNR vs. DKNG - Volatility Comparison

Intuitive Machines Inc. (LUNR) has a higher volatility of 44.37% compared to DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) at 13.48%. This indicates that LUNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DKNG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LUNRDKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.37%

13.48%

+30.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

90.79%

35.05%

+55.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

109.27%

46.56%

+62.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

171.34%

61.05%

+110.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

171.34%

63.17%

+108.17%

Dividends

LUNR vs. DKNG - Dividend Comparison

Neither LUNR nor DKNG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LUNR vs. DKNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Intuitive Machines Inc. and DraftKings Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
186.73M
1.65B
(LUNR) Total Revenue
(DKNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LUNR vs. DKNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Intuitive Machines Inc. and DraftKings Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-100.0%-50.0%0.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
39.0%
42.3%
Portfolio components
LUNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a gross profit of 72.82M and revenue of 186.73M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

DKNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DraftKings Inc. reported a gross profit of 696.69M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.3%.

LUNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported an operating income of -39.20M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in an operating margin of -21.0%.

DKNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DraftKings Inc. reported an operating income of 5.85M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

LUNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Intuitive Machines Inc. reported a net income of -37.55M and revenue of 186.73M, resulting in a net margin of -20.1%.

DKNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DraftKings Inc. reported a net income of 21.07M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LUNR and DKNG have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LUNR has higher volatility (44.37%) compared to DKNG (13.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LUNR dropped -97.43% vs DKNG's -85.73%.

LUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LUNR and DKNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer