PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DKNG vs. PENN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

DKNG vs. PENN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) and Penn National Gaming, Inc. (PENN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DKNG achieves a -26.58% return, which is significantly lower than PENN's 36.34% return.


DKNG

1D
-3.91%
1M
10.00%
YTD
-26.58%
6M
-24.72%
1Y
-24.99%
3Y*
0.51%
5Y*
-12.64%
10Y*

PENN

1D
-0.64%
1M
16.44%
YTD
36.34%
6M
36.90%
1Y
36.06%
3Y*
-8.68%
5Y*
-24.07%
10Y*
2.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DKNG vs. PENN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
-26.58%-7.37%5.53%209.48%-58.54%-41.00%140.62%
PENN
Penn National Gaming, Inc.
36.34%-25.58%-23.83%-12.39%-42.72%-39.97%512.55%

Correlation

The correlation between DKNG and PENN is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 27, 2020

0.55

The correlation between DKNG and PENN shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (3 years) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

DKNG:

$0.15

PENN:

-$6.84

PS Ratio

DKNG:

1.60

PENN:

0.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

DKNG:

$6.29B

PENN:

$7.07B

Gross Profit (TTM)

DKNG:

$2.63B

PENN:

$2.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

DKNG:

$319.39M

PENN:

-$131.70M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DKNG vs. PENN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DKNG
DKNG Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
DKNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DKNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
DKNG Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
DKNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
DKNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

PENN
PENN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PENN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PENN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PENN Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
PENN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PENN Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DKNG vs. PENN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) and Penn National Gaming, Inc. (PENN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


DKNGPENNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.53

0.69

-1.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.49

1.41

-1.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.17

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

0.84

-1.35

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.85

1.61

-2.46

DKNG vs. PENN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DKNG Sharpe Ratio is -0.53, which is lower than the PENN Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DKNG and PENN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


DKNGPENNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.53

0.69

-1.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.21

-0.45

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.29

-0.22

Drawdowns

DKNG vs. PENN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DKNG drawdown since its inception was -85.73%, smaller than the maximum PENN drawdown of -91.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DKNG and PENN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DKNGPENNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.73%

-91.38%

+5.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-57.04%

-42.55%

-14.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.26%

-57.42%

-3.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.87%

-86.14%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-91.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.85%

-85.26%

+20.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.90%

-33.87%

-15.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.54%

22.11%

+12.43%

Volatility

DKNG vs. PENN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for DraftKings Inc. (DKNG) is 14.68%, while Penn National Gaming, Inc. (PENN) has a volatility of 16.19%. This indicates that DKNG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PENN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DKNGPENNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.68%

16.19%

-1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.27%

41.60%

-6.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.38%

52.49%

-5.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.14%

54.14%

+7.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.25%

61.47%

+1.78%

Dividends

DKNG vs. PENN - Dividend Comparison

Neither DKNG nor PENN has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

DKNG vs. PENN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DraftKings Inc. and Penn National Gaming, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B20222023202420252026
1.65B
1.78B
(DKNG) Total Revenue
(PENN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

DKNG vs. PENN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between DraftKings Inc. and Penn National Gaming, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
42.3%
29.5%
Portfolio components
DKNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DraftKings Inc. reported a gross profit of 696.69M and revenue of 1.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.3%.

PENN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penn National Gaming, Inc. reported a gross profit of 524.80M and revenue of 1.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.5%.

DKNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DraftKings Inc. reported an operating income of 5.85M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.4%.

PENN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penn National Gaming, Inc. reported an operating income of 97.10M and revenue of 1.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 5.5%.

DKNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, DraftKings Inc. reported a net income of 21.07M and revenue of 1.65B, resulting in a net margin of 1.3%.

PENN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Penn National Gaming, Inc. reported a net income of -2.30M and revenue of 1.78B, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


DKNG and PENN have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PENN has higher volatility (16.19%) compared to DKNG (14.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DKNG dropped -85.73% vs PENN's -91.38%.

PENN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.69 vs -0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DKNG and PENN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer