LULU vs. USFR

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LULU (Lululemon Athletica Inc.) is a stock, while USFR (WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund) is Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. Over the past 10 years, LULU returned 6.15%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for USFR. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LULU vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LULU achieves a -39.89% return, which is significantly lower than USFR's 1.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LULU has outperformed USFR with an annualized return of 6.15%, while USFR has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.

LULU

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: -4.06%
• YTD: -39.89%
• 6M: -31.96%
• 1Y: -62.73%
• 3Y*: -29.50%
• 5Y*: -17.63%
• 10Y*: 6.15%

USFR

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 1.60%
• 6M: 1.96%
• 1Y: 4.01%
• 3Y*: 4.76%
• 5Y*: 3.66%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LULU vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	-39.89%	-45.66%	-25.21%	59.59%	-18.16%	12.48%	50.23%	90.50%	54.74%	20.93%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	1.60%	4.23%	5.47%	5.18%	1.98%	-0.03%	0.56%	2.02%	2.01%	1.03%

Correlation

The correlation between LULU and USFR is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.01
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2014	0.02

The correlation between LULU and USFR shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.02 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LULU vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LULU

LULU Risk / Return Rank: 3
LULU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
LULU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
LULU Omega Ratio Rank: 2
LULU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
LULU Martin Ratio Rank: 9

USFR

USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LULU vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LULU	USFR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.32	15.01	-16.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.15	50.39	-52.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.71	13.37	-12.66
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.98	202.38	-203.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.37	783.80	-785.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LULU vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LULU Sharpe Ratio is -1.32, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 15.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LULU and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LULU	USFR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.32	15.01	-16.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.42	9.25	-9.68
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.15	3.07	-2.92
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	1.60	-1.35

Drawdowns

LULU vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LULU drawdown since its inception was -92.26%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LULU and USFR.

Drawdown Indicators

	LULU	USFR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.26%	-1.36%	-90.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-63.98%	-0.02%	-63.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-76.70%	-0.06%	-76.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.70%	-0.18%	-76.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.70%	-0.80%	-75.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.57%	0.00%	-75.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.55%	-0.16%	-27.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.41%	0.01%	+46.40%

Volatility

LULU vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) has a higher volatility of 9.68% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.06%. This indicates that LULU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LULU	USFR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.68%	0.06%	+9.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.59%	0.18%	+31.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	47.58%	0.27%	+47.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	42.00%	0.40%	+41.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.53%	0.81%	+39.72%

Dividends

LULU vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

LULU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while USFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
LULU Lululemon Athletica Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
USFR WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund	3.91%	4.15%	5.17%	5.12%	1.78%	0.01%	0.40%	2.08%	1.67%	1.03%	0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LULU and USFR in my portfolio?

LULU and USFR have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LULU or USFR?

LULU has higher volatility (9.68%) compared to USFR (0.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LULU dropped -92.26% vs USFR's -1.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (15.01 vs -1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.