PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTUSX vs. FUAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTUSX achieves a 0.47% return, which is significantly higher than FUAMX's -0.27% return.


LTUSX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.17%
YTD
0.47%
6M
0.45%
1Y
4.63%
3Y*
3.65%
5Y*
0.68%
10Y*
1.02%

FUAMX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.10%
YTD
-0.27%
6M
-0.64%
1Y
4.20%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
-0.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
0.47%6.40%2.40%3.40%-8.06%-1.82%3.77%3.61%0.98%-0.06%
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
-0.27%8.00%0.40%4.08%-13.06%-3.19%8.86%7.25%1.25%-0.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LTUSX and FUAMX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2017

0.90

The correlation between LTUSX and FUAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTUSX vs. FUAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTUSX
LTUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
LTUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
LTUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

FUAMX
FUAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FUAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FUAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
FUAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FUAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
FUAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) and Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTUSXFUAMXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.53

0.95

+0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.28

1.44

+0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.17

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

1.11

+0.83

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.84

3.27

+2.57

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is higher than the FUAMX Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTUSX and FUAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTUSXFUAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.53

0.95

+0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

-0.05

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.22

+0.93

Drawdowns

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTUSX drawdown since its inception was -12.34%, smaller than the maximum FUAMX drawdown of -20.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTUSX and FUAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTUSXFUAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.34%

-20.25%

+7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.31%

-3.72%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.69%

-6.07%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.69%

-18.27%

+6.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.50%

-6.69%

+5.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.40%

-7.32%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.76%

1.26%

-0.50%

Volatility

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund (LTUSX) is 0.95%, while Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund (FUAMX) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that LTUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FUAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTUSXFUAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.95%

1.44%

-0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.04%

3.09%

-1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93%

4.34%

-1.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.02%

6.63%

-2.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.08%

5.85%

-2.77%

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTUSX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than FUAMX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTUSX vs. FUAMX - Dividend Comparison

LTUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, less than FUAMX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FUAMX
Fidelity Intermediate Treasury Bond Index Fund
3.75%3.52%3.58%2.20%1.24%1.76%2.90%2.16%2.23%0.49%0.00%0.00%
LTUSX
Thornburg Limited Term U.S. Government Fund
2.63%2.69%2.62%1.89%1.63%1.21%1.35%1.77%1.90%1.45%2.52%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, LTUSX and FUAMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FUAMX has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to LTUSX (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTUSX dropped -12.34% vs FUAMX's -20.25%.

LTUSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTUSX and FUAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer