LTTI vs. PAPI

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LTTI (FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF) and PAPI (Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LTTI returned 4.48% vs 12.39% for PAPI. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTTI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for PAPI.

Performance

LTTI vs. PAPI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTTI achieves a -1.05% return, which is significantly lower than PAPI's 5.81% return.

LTTI

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: -1.05%
• 6M: -2.14%
• 1Y: 4.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAPI

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 5.81%
• 6M: 5.78%
• 1Y: 12.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTTI vs. PAPI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF	-1.05%	2.30%
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF	5.81%	3.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LTTI and PAPI is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2025	0.14

Return for Risk

LTTI vs. PAPI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTTI

LTTI Risk / Return Rank: 17
LTTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
LTTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LTTI Omega Ratio Rank: 16
LTTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
LTTI Martin Ratio Rank: 17

PAPI

PAPI Risk / Return Rank: 33
PAPI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
PAPI Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
PAPI Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PAPI Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
PAPI Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTTI vs. PAPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) and Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTTI	PAPI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	1.19	-0.69
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.78	1.82	-1.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.21	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.64	1.81	-1.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.57	4.90	-3.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTTI vs. PAPI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTTI Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the PAPI Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTTI and PAPI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTTI	PAPI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	1.19	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.88	-0.78

Drawdowns

LTTI vs. PAPI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTTI drawdown since its inception was -9.02%, smaller than the maximum PAPI drawdown of -14.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTTI and PAPI.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTTI	PAPI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.02%	-14.27%	+5.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.08%	-6.86%	-0.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.69%	-5.06%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.65%	-2.73%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	2.53%	+0.33%

Volatility

LTTI vs. PAPI - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF (LTTI) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF (PAPI) at 2.23%. This indicates that LTTI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTTI	PAPI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.56%	2.23%	+0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.06%	7.00%	-0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.92%	10.55%	-1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.28%	11.76%	-1.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.28%	11.76%	-1.48%

LTTI vs. PAPI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTTI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPI's 0.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTTI vs. PAPI - Dividend Comparison

LTTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.21%, more than PAPI's 7.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
LTTI FT Vest 20+ Year Treasury & Target Income ETF	9.21%	7.08%	0.00%	0.00%
PAPI Parametric Equity Premium Income ETF	7.62%	7.59%	7.07%	1.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTTI and PAPI in my portfolio?

LTTI and PAPI have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTTI or PAPI?

LTTI has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to PAPI (2.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTTI dropped -9.02% vs PAPI's -14.27%.

Which ETF is better, LTTI or PAPI?

On 1-year performance, PAPI leads with 12.39% vs 4.48% for LTTI. On fees, PAPI is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PAPI has been the lower-risk option at 2.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTTI or PAPI?

Over the 1-year period, PAPI has performed better with a 12.39% return vs 4.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTTI or PAPI?

PAPI is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LTTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTTI or PAPI?

LTTI has the higher dividend yield at 9.21%, compared with 7.62% for PAPI.

What is the main difference between LTTI and PAPI?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Morgan Stanley. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for LTTI and 0.29% for PAPI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.