LTPZ vs. IRVH
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH).
LTPZ and IRVH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. IRVH is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Jul 5, 2022.
Performance
LTPZ vs. IRVH - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTPZ vs. IRVH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | -1.39% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -8.70% |
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | -1.97% | 7.71% | -5.49% | 0.83% | -6.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly higher than IRVH's -1.97% return.
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- -2.68%
- 3Y*
- -2.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.68%
- 10Y*
- 0.59%
IRVH
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -2.07%
- YTD
- -1.97%
- 6M
- -1.43%
- 1Y
- 0.81%
- 3Y*
- -0.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTPZ vs. IRVH - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IRVH's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LTPZ vs. IRVH — Risk / Return Rank
LTPZ
IRVH
LTPZ vs. IRVH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTPZ | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 0.13 | -0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 0.22 | -0.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.03 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 0.26 | -0.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 0.60 | -1.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTPZ | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 0.13 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | -0.19 | +0.39 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTPZ and IRVH is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LTPZ vs. IRVH - Dividend Comparison
LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than IRVH's 5.20% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.64% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
IRVH Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF | 5.20% | 4.89% | 3.34% | 3.69% | 2.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LTPZ vs. IRVH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than IRVH's maximum drawdown of -14.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and IRVH.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTPZ | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -14.98% | -26.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -4.59% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.99% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.95% | -9.06% | -24.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -9.73% | -2.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 1.97% | +1.95% |
Volatility
LTPZ vs. IRVH - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Global X Interest Rate Volatility & Inflation Hedge ETF (IRVH) at 2.12%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IRVH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTPZ | IRVH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 2.12% | +1.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | 3.50% | +2.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 6.29% | +4.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 9.02% | +6.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 9.02% | +6.08% |