LTPZ vs. FIPDX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX).
LTPZ is a passively managed fund by PIMCO that tracks the performance of the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (15+ Y). It was launched on Sep 3, 2009. FIPDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 16, 2012.
Performance
LTPZ vs. FIPDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTPZ vs. FIPDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | -1.39% | 4.00% | -4.80% | 0.96% | -31.71% | 7.02% | 24.89% | 17.47% | -7.22% | 9.07% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.33% | 6.90% | 2.00% | 3.77% | -12.09% | 5.94% | 10.90% | 8.32% | -1.37% | 2.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTPZ achieves a -1.39% return, which is significantly lower than FIPDX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LTPZ has underperformed FIPDX with an annualized return of 0.59%, while FIPDX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.58% annualized return.
LTPZ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- -2.68%
- 3Y*
- -2.37%
- 5Y*
- -4.68%
- 10Y*
- 0.59%
FIPDX
- 1D
- 0.55%
- 1M
- -1.40%
- YTD
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- 1Y
- 2.97%
- 3Y*
- 3.15%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTPZ vs. FIPDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than FIPDX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
LTPZ vs. FIPDX — Risk / Return Rank
LTPZ
FIPDX
LTPZ vs. FIPDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) and Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTPZ | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | 0.83 | -1.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | 1.17 | -1.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.15 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.21 | 1.37 | -1.59 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.43 | 4.30 | -4.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTPZ | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 | 0.83 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | 0.24 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.04 | 0.48 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.21 | 0.40 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTPZ and FIPDX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LTPZ vs. FIPDX - Dividend Comparison
LTPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than FIPDX's 4.16% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTPZ PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.64% | 4.64% | 3.71% | 3.71% | 8.38% | 3.56% | 1.42% | 1.74% | 3.05% | 2.25% | 2.32% | 0.71% |
FIPDX Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 4.16% | 4.18% | 3.75% | 3.56% | 8.87% | 4.76% | 1.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 1.29% | 1.34% | 0.38% |
Drawdowns
LTPZ vs. FIPDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTPZ drawdown since its inception was -40.99%, which is greater than FIPDX's maximum drawdown of -14.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTPZ and FIPDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTPZ | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.99% | -14.32% | -26.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.82% | -2.90% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.99% | -14.32% | -26.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.99% | -14.32% | -26.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.95% | -1.40% | -32.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -4.52% | -7.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.92% | 0.92% | +3.00% |
Volatility
LTPZ vs. FIPDX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 15+ Year US TIPS Index ETF (LTPZ) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to Fidelity Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FIPDX) at 1.37%. This indicates that LTPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIPDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTPZ | FIPDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 1.37% | +2.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.46% | 2.35% | +4.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.28% | 4.13% | +7.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.92% | 5.99% | +9.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.10% | 5.38% | +9.72% |