PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTMFX vs. USMTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LTMFX having a 0.82% return and USMTX slightly lower at 0.79%.


LTMFX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.34%
YTD
0.82%
6M
1.01%
1Y
4.35%
3Y*
3.80%
5Y*
1.28%
10Y*
1.45%

USMTX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.21%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.01%
1Y
2.65%
3Y*
3.12%
5Y*
1.93%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTMFX
Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund
0.82%5.74%1.84%3.83%-5.27%-0.18%2.97%3.81%1.00%2.29%
USMTX
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund
0.79%2.96%3.30%3.46%-0.71%-0.05%1.07%2.01%1.32%0.88%

Correlation

The correlation between LTMFX and USMTX is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.39

The correlation between LTMFX and USMTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.31 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTMFX vs. USMTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTMFX
LTMFX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LTMFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTMFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTMFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
LTMFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTMFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

USMTX
USMTX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
USMTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USMTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
USMTX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USMTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
USMTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) and JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTMFXUSMTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.88

5.63

-3.75

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

8.91

-6.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

49.19

-42.18

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTMFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is lower than the USMTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTMFX and USMTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTMFXUSMTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

4.52

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

2.69

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

2.12

-1.28

Drawdowns

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTMFX drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, which is greater than USMTX's maximum drawdown of -1.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTMFX and USMTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTMFXUSMTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-1.98%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.96%

-0.30%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.95%

-0.50%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.40%

-1.92%

-6.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-8.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.81%

0.00%

-0.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-0.18%

-1.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.62%

0.05%

+0.57%

Volatility

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund (LTMFX) has a higher volatility of 0.63% compared to JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund (USMTX) at 0.20%. This indicates that LTMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USMTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTMFXUSMTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.20%

+0.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

0.44%

+0.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.59%

0.59%

+1.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.35%

0.72%

+1.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.27%

0.75%

+1.52%

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTMFX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than USMTX's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTMFX vs. USMTX - Dividend Comparison

LTMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, more than USMTX's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTMFX
Thornburg Limited Term Municipal Fund
3.23%4.28%3.60%2.11%1.62%1.27%1.54%1.78%1.83%1.64%1.57%1.56%
USMTX
JPMorgan Ultra-Short Municipal Fund
2.52%2.62%3.05%2.58%0.89%0.25%0.76%1.49%1.31%0.78%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTMFX and USMTX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTMFX has higher volatility (0.63%) compared to USMTX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTMFX dropped -8.40% vs USMTX's -1.98%.

USMTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.52 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTMFX and USMTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer