PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTIUX vs. FCTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTIUX achieves a 5.50% return, which is significantly lower than FCTKX's 12.56% return.


LTIUX

1D
-0.78%
1M
-0.21%
6M
3.62%
YTD
5.50%
1Y
12.39%
3Y*
13.00%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
9.30%

FCTKX

1D
-1.40%
1M
-0.10%
6M
9.29%
YTD
12.56%
1Y
24.60%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
10.30%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
5.50%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%9.01%
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
12.56%24.06%14.41%20.84%-18.09%16.86%18.53%25.67%-8.66%9.78%

Correlation

The correlation between LTIUX and FCTKX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.96

The correlation between LTIUX and FCTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTIUX vs. FCTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FCTKX
FCTKX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FCTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FCTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTIUXFCTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.89

2.55

-0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.20

11.03

-2.84

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTIUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the FCTKX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTIUX and FCTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTIUX drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, which is greater than FCTKX's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTIUX and FCTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTIUXFCTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-30.94%

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-9.78%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-15.40%

+4.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-27.16%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-2.11%

+0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.67%

-5.41%

-1.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.52%

2.26%

-0.74%

Volatility

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) is 3.05%, while Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6 (FCTKX) has a volatility of 5.36%. This indicates that LTIUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTIUXFCTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.05%

5.36%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.70%

12.15%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.20%

14.14%

-4.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.91%

15.28%

-3.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.42%

15.94%

-3.52%

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTIUX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FCTKX's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTIUX vs. FCTKX - Dividend Comparison

LTIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.56%, more than FCTKX's 5.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2055 Fund Class K6
5.20%4.06%2.31%2.19%11.70%11.47%4.40%6.53%7.08%2.74%0.00%0.00%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.56%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, LTIUX and FCTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCTKX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to LTIUX (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTIUX dropped -49.65% vs FCTKX's -30.94%.

FCTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTIUX and FCTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer