PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTIUX vs. DRIQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTIUX achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly higher than DRIQX's 4.37% return. Over the past 10 years, LTIUX has outperformed DRIQX with an annualized return of 9.59%, while DRIQX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.86% annualized return.


LTIUX

1D
0.28%
1M
3.36%
YTD
6.70%
6M
6.91%
1Y
17.03%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
7.01%
10Y*
9.59%

DRIQX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.38%
YTD
4.37%
6M
4.18%
1Y
9.75%
3Y*
7.55%
5Y*
2.88%
10Y*
4.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
6.70%14.26%14.13%16.51%-17.48%14.07%15.70%23.48%-7.37%19.69%
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
4.37%8.83%5.47%8.17%-14.79%7.79%14.31%14.08%-4.20%7.82%

Correlation

The correlation between LTIUX and DRIQX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.64

The correlation between LTIUX and DRIQX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (all time) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTIUX vs. DRIQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTIUX
LTIUX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LTIUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTIUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTIUX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LTIUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTIUX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIQX
DRIQX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
DRIQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIQX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) and Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTIUXDRIQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.45

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.85

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.84

12.36

-0.52

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTIUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the DRIQX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTIUX and DRIQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTIUXDRIQXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.03

2.33

-0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.41

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.74

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.81

-0.33

Drawdowns

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTIUX drawdown since its inception was -49.65%, which is greater than DRIQX's maximum drawdown of -19.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTIUX and DRIQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTIUXDRIQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.65%

-19.86%

-29.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.57%

-3.47%

-3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.08%

-6.08%

-5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.23%

-19.86%

-4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.12%

-19.86%

-8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-3.89%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.47%

0.79%

+0.68%

Volatility

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Volatility Comparison

Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund (LTIUX) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIQX) at 1.32%. This indicates that LTIUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTIUXDRIQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

1.32%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.96%

3.19%

+3.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.62%

4.24%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.83%

7.05%

+4.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.49%

6.59%

+5.90%

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTIUX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIQX's 0.17% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

LTIUX vs. DRIQX - Dividend Comparison

LTIUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than DRIQX's 4.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRIQX
Dimensional 2015 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
4.76%4.95%4.53%4.28%6.51%4.54%3.76%2.05%2.23%1.66%1.37%0.00%
LTIUX
Principal LifeTime 2035 Fund
8.46%9.03%9.46%4.17%7.50%7.06%5.35%7.28%7.75%5.46%4.28%5.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTIUX and DRIQX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTIUX has higher volatility (2.62%) compared to DRIQX (1.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTIUX dropped -49.65% vs DRIQX's -19.86%.

DRIQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTIUX and DRIQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer