LTFIX vs. PBCKX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LTFIX (Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund) and PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) are both mutual funds - LTFIX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Principal, while PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, LTFIX returned 11.73%/yr vs 16.27%/yr for PBCKX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LTFIX charges 0.01%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PBCKX.

Performance

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTFIX achieves a 6.75% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's -5.68% return. Over the past 10 years, LTFIX has underperformed PBCKX with an annualized return of 11.73%, while PBCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.27% annualized return.

LTFIX

• 1D: -1.74%
• 1M: -0.32%
• YTD: 6.75%
• 6M: 5.96%
• 1Y: 17.19%
• 3Y*: 17.44%
• 5Y*: 8.56%
• 10Y*: 11.73%

PBCKX

• 1D: -0.56%
• 1M: -4.72%
• YTD: -5.68%
• 6M: -6.60%
• 1Y: -3.09%
• 3Y*: 15.58%
• 5Y*: 6.41%
• 10Y*: 16.27%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	6.75%	17.80%	17.28%	20.33%	-18.84%	17.73%	16.47%	27.27%	-9.03%	22.52%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	-5.68%	9.20%	26.90%	40.58%	-30.74%	25.05%	34.77%	45.22%	2.83%	28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between LTFIX and PBCKX is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.89
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012	0.90

The correlation between LTFIX and PBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LTFIX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTFIX

LTFIX Risk / Return Rank: 37
LTFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
LTFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
LTFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LTFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
LTFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 50

PBCKX

PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTFIX	PBCKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	-0.11	+1.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.11	-0.04	+2.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.00	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	-0.09	+2.26
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.48	-0.27	+9.75

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is higher than the PBCKX Sharpe Ratio of -0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTFIX and PBCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTFIX drawdown since its inception was -52.73%, which is greater than PBCKX's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTFIX and PBCKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTFIX	PBCKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.73%	-38.00%	-14.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.71%	-19.10%	+10.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.70%	-19.10%	+3.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.80%	-38.00%	+11.20%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.50%	-38.00%	+4.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.66%	-9.26%	+6.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.62%	-5.65%	-1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	6.48%	-4.50%

Volatility

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund (LTFIX) is 5.17%, while Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a volatility of 5.79%. This indicates that LTFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTFIX	PBCKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.17%	5.79%	-0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.48%	13.07%	-2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.66%	15.87%	-3.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.59%	20.46%	-4.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.82%	20.22%	-4.40%

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTFIX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTFIX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison

LTFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.18%, less than PBCKX's 21.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTFIX Principal LifeTime 2055 Fund	8.18%	8.73%	8.47%	4.17%	8.60%	5.83%	3.91%	6.03%	6.60%	3.51%	3.99%	4.51%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	21.15%	19.94%	9.01%	0.51%	0.71%	6.67%	3.28%	8.90%	7.86%	2.79%	1.01%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTFIX and PBCKX in my portfolio?

LTFIX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTFIX or PBCKX?

PBCKX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to LTFIX (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTFIX dropped -52.73% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LTFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.