LTCN vs. SOEZ
LTCN (Grayscale Litecoin Trust) and SOEZ (Franklin Solana ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. LTCN is passively managed, while SOEZ is actively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTCN charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for SOEZ.
Performance
LTCN vs. SOEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LTCN having a -42.76% return and SOEZ slightly lower at -43.12%.
LTCN
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -19.52%
- YTD
- -42.76%
- 6M
- -51.38%
- 1Y
- -52.40%
- 3Y*
- -6.83%
- 5Y*
- -59.10%
- 10Y*
- —
SOEZ
- 1D
- -3.99%
- 1M
- -20.02%
- YTD
- -43.12%
- 6M
- -49.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTCN vs. SOEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust | -42.76% | -16.64% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | -43.12% | -11.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTCN and SOEZ is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTCN vs. SOEZ — Risk / Return Rank
LTCN
SOEZ
LTCN vs. SOEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Franklin Solana ETF (SOEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTCN | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTCN | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.20 | -1.10 | +0.90 |
Drawdowns
LTCN vs. SOEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than SOEZ's maximum drawdown of -52.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and SOEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTCN | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.58% | -52.20% | -47.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -69.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.33% | -52.20% | -47.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -89.62% | -30.97% | -58.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 43.18% | — | — |
Volatility
LTCN vs. SOEZ - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTCN | SOEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.08% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.66% | 68.82% | +0.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 106.66% | 68.82% | +37.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 141.37% | 68.82% | +72.55% |
LTCN vs. SOEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SOEZ's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTCN vs. SOEZ - Dividend Comparison
LTCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SOEZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust | 0.00% |
SOEZ Franklin Solana ETF | 0.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LTCN and SOEZ have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOEZ is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOEZ is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.
SOEZ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for LTCN.
They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for LTCN and 0.19% for SOEZ.
Find the right allocation for LTCN and SOEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer