LTCN vs. MNRS

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

LTCN (Grayscale Litecoin Trust) and MNRS (Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LTCN is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index, while MNRS is a Blockchain fund tracking the Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LTCN returned -52.40% vs 112.67% for MNRS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LTCN charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MNRS.

Performance

LTCN vs. MNRS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -42.76% return, which is significantly lower than MNRS's 62.19% return.

LTCN

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -19.52%
• YTD: -42.76%
• 6M: -51.38%
• 1Y: -52.40%
• 3Y*: -6.83%
• 5Y*: -59.10%
• 10Y*: —

MNRS

• 1D: -2.38%
• 1M: 23.67%
• YTD: 62.19%
• 6M: 32.49%
• 1Y: 112.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCN vs. MNRS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust	-42.76%	-47.78%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	62.19%	12.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCN and MNRS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2025	0.49

Return for Risk

LTCN vs. MNRS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCN

LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 3
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

MNRS

MNRS Risk / Return Rank: 40
MNRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
MNRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
MNRS Omega Ratio Rank: 41
MNRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
MNRS Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCN vs. MNRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTCN	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.75	1.62	-2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.03	2.20	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.88	1.26	-0.37
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.75	2.00	-2.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	3.91	-5.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTCN vs. MNRS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.75, which is lower than the MNRS Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCN and MNRS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTCN	MNRS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.75	1.62	-2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.20	0.81	-1.01

Drawdowns

LTCN vs. MNRS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than MNRS's maximum drawdown of -56.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and MNRS.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCN	MNRS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.58%	-56.70%	-42.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-69.62%	-56.70%	-12.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-92.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.28%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.33%	-10.60%	-88.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.62%	-23.69%	-65.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	43.18%	28.94%	+14.24%

Volatility

LTCN vs. MNRS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) is 12.32%, while Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF (MNRS) has a volatility of 19.78%. This indicates that LTCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MNRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTCN	MNRS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.32%	19.78%	-7.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.08%	52.30%	-11.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	69.66%	70.18%	-0.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	106.66%	70.43%	+36.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	141.37%	70.43%	+70.94%

LTCN vs. MNRS - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MNRS's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCN vs. MNRS - Dividend Comparison

LTCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MNRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.

Position	TTM	2025
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust	0.00%	0.00%
MNRS Grayscale Bitcoin Miners ETF	0.33%	0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCN and MNRS in my portfolio?

LTCN and MNRS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTCN or MNRS?

MNRS has higher volatility (19.78%) compared to LTCN (12.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTCN dropped -99.58% vs MNRS's -56.70%.

Which ETF is better, LTCN or MNRS?

On 1-year performance, MNRS leads with 112.67% vs -52.40% for LTCN. On fees, MNRS is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, LTCN has been the lower-risk option at 12.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTCN or MNRS?

Over the 1-year period, MNRS has performed better with a 112.67% return vs -52.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCN or MNRS?

MNRS is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCN or MNRS?

MNRS has the higher dividend yield at 0.33%, compared with 0.00% for LTCN.

What is the main difference between LTCN and MNRS?

LTCN is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while MNRS is Blockchain. LTCN tracks CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index, while MNRS tracks Indxx Bitcoin Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for LTCN and 0.59% for MNRS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MNRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.