PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTCN vs. IBLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LTCN vs. IBLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LTCN vs. IBLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
LTCN
Grayscale Litecoin Trust
-30.08%-54.37%-18.79%650.00%-60.00%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
-10.68%27.05%18.58%201.47%-57.76%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -30.08% return, which is significantly lower than IBLC's -10.68% return.


LTCN

1D
0.99%
1M
-0.71%
YTD
-30.08%
6M
-53.58%
1Y
-37.99%
3Y*
0.25%
5Y*
-48.71%
10Y*

IBLC

1D
6.56%
1M
-5.99%
YTD
-10.68%
6M
-29.99%
1Y
57.18%
3Y*
34.97%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LTCN vs. IBLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IBLC's 0.47% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LTCN vs. IBLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCN
LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

IBLC
IBLC Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IBLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBLC Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
IBLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCN vs. IBLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTCNIBLCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

0.99

-1.49

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.39

1.62

-2.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.19

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.67

1.18

-1.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.25

2.64

-3.89

LTCN vs. IBLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the IBLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCN and IBLC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTCNIBLCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

0.99

-1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.19

0.23

-0.41

Correlation

The correlation between LTCN and IBLC is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

LTCN vs. IBLC - Dividend Comparison

LTCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.06%.


TTM2025202420232022
LTCN
Grayscale Litecoin Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IBLC
iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF
7.06%6.31%1.60%1.79%0.84%

Drawdowns

LTCN vs. IBLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than IBLC's maximum drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and IBLC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LTCNIBLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.58%

-62.54%

-37.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-65.17%

-44.94%

-20.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.18%

-41.28%

-57.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-89.31%

-26.00%

-63.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.69%

20.15%

+14.54%

Volatility

LTCN vs. IBLC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) is 11.52%, while iShares Blockchain and Tech ETF (IBLC) has a volatility of 18.51%. This indicates that LTCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LTCNIBLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.52%

18.51%

-6.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.46%

44.23%

+10.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

75.66%

58.34%

+17.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.23%

65.16%

+48.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

143.44%

65.16%

+78.28%