LTCN vs. ACLO

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

LTCN (Grayscale Litecoin Trust) and ACLO (TCW AAA CLO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LTCN is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CoinDesk Litecoin Price Index, while ACLO is a CLO fund actively managed by TCW. LTCN is passively managed, while ACLO is actively managed. Over the past year, LTCN returned -55.20% vs 5.30% for ACLO. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. LTCN charges 2.50%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ACLO.

Performance

LTCN vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTCN achieves a -49.10% return, which is significantly lower than ACLO's 2.46% return.

LTCN

• 1D: -4.75%
• 1M: -24.62%
• YTD: -49.10%
• 6M: -50.17%
• 1Y: -55.20%
• 3Y*: -11.94%
• 5Y*: -49.64%
• 10Y*: —

ACLO

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 2.46%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 5.30%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTCN vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust	-49.10%	-54.37%	-22.01%
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	2.46%	5.32%	0.81%

Correlation

The correlation between LTCN and ACLO is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2024	-0.04

Return for Risk

LTCN vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTCN

LTCN Risk / Return Rank: 3
LTCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LTCN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ACLO

ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 99
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTCN vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTCN	ACLO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.79	7.32	-8.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.14	15.12	-16.26
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.87	3.44	-2.56
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	19.85	-20.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.20	165.43	-166.63

LTCN vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTCN Sharpe Ratio is -0.79, which is lower than the ACLO Sharpe Ratio of 7.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTCN and ACLO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTCN vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTCN drawdown since its inception was -99.58%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCN and ACLO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTCN	ACLO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.58%	-1.01%	-98.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-72.99%	-0.27%	-72.72%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-93.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.41%	0.00%	-99.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-89.66%	-0.04%	-89.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.03%	0.03%	+46.00%

Volatility

LTCN vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison

Grayscale Litecoin Trust (LTCN) has a higher volatility of 16.40% compared to TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO) at 0.19%. This indicates that LTCN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACLO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTCN	ACLO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.40%	0.19%	+16.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	41.24%	0.58%	+40.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.24%	0.73%	+69.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	105.03%	1.07%	+103.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	141.55%	1.07%	+140.48%

LTCN vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTCN has a 2.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

LTCN vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

LTCN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.90%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
ACLO TCW AAA CLO ETF	4.90%	4.87%	0.59%
LTCN Grayscale Litecoin Trust	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTCN and ACLO in my portfolio?

LTCN and ACLO have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTCN or ACLO?

LTCN has higher volatility (16.40%) compared to ACLO (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTCN dropped -99.58% vs ACLO's -1.01%.

Which ETF is better, LTCN or ACLO?

On 1-year performance, ACLO leads with 5.30% vs -55.20% for LTCN. On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACLO has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTCN or ACLO?

Over the 1-year period, ACLO has performed better with a 5.30% return vs -55.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTCN or ACLO?

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 2.50% for LTCN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTCN or ACLO?

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 0.00% for LTCN.

What is the main difference between LTCN and ACLO?

LTCN is categorized as Cryptocurrency, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Grayscale and TCW. Their fees differ too: 2.50% for LTCN and 0.20% for ACLO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACLO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.32 vs -0.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.