LTCC vs. EZBC
LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. LTCC is actively managed, while EZBC is passively managed. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LTCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.
Performance
LTCC vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTCC achieves a -45.59% return, which is significantly lower than EZBC's -28.83% return.
LTCC
- 1D
- -6.12%
- 1M
- -21.31%
- YTD
- -45.59%
- 6M
- -46.18%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EZBC
- 1D
- -3.22%
- 1M
- -17.79%
- YTD
- -28.83%
- 6M
- -28.96%
- 1Y
- -39.76%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTCC vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF | -45.59% | -25.94% |
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF | -28.83% | -23.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTCC and EZBC is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTCC vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank
LTCC
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
EZBC
LTCC vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTCC | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.86 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.77 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.30 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTCC vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -61.39%, which is greater than EZBC's maximum drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and EZBC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTCC | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.39% | -52.07% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -52.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.18% | -50.46% | -10.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.44% | -16.89% | -22.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.56% | — |
Volatility
LTCC vs. EZBC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTCC | EZBC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 13.04% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.61% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.84% | 44.23% | +19.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.84% | 50.15% | +13.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.84% | 50.15% | +13.69% |
LTCC vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTCC vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison
Neither LTCC nor EZBC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
LTCC and EZBC have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTCC.
LTCC and EZBC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 0.19% for EZBC.
Find the right allocation for LTCC and EZBC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer