LTCC vs. ARKY
LTCC (Canary Litecoin ETF) and ARKY (ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. LTCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for ARKY.
Performance
LTCC vs. ARKY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LTCC
- 1D
- -1.79%
- 1M
- -14.54%
- YTD
- -38.64%
- 6M
- -45.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARKY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LTCC vs. ARKY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LTCC Canary Litecoin ETF | -14.41% |
ARKY ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTCC vs. ARKY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Litecoin ETF (LTCC) and ARK 21Shares Active Bitcoin Ethereum Strategy ETF (ARKY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTCC | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -1.11 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LTCC vs. ARKY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTCC drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than ARKY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTCC and ARKY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTCC | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | 0.00% | -56.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.22% | 0.00% | -56.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.73% | 0.00% | -37.73% |
Volatility
LTCC vs. ARKY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTCC | ARKY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 64.50% | 0.00% | +64.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.50% | 0.00% | +64.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 64.50% | 0.00% | +64.50% |
LTCC vs. ARKY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than ARKY's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
LTCC vs. ARKY - Dividend Comparison
Neither LTCC nor ARKY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LTCC is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LTCC is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for ARKY.
LTCC and ARKY have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Canary Capital and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTCC and 1.00% for ARKY.
Find the right allocation for LTCC and ARKY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer