LSVQX vs. PCLIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LSVQX (LSV Small Cap Value Fund) and PCLIX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - LSVQX is a Small Cap Value Equities fund managed by LSV, while PCLIX is a Commodities fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX returned 9.37%/yr vs 11.35%/yr for PCLIX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LSVQX charges 0.83%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for PCLIX.

Performance

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVQX achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly lower than PCLIX's 25.15% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX has underperformed PCLIX with an annualized return of 9.37%, while PCLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.35% annualized return.

LSVQX

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 15.45%
• 6M: 13.81%
• 1Y: 28.66%
• 3Y*: 15.26%
• 5Y*: 8.69%
• 10Y*: 9.37%

PCLIX

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: -9.68%
• YTD: 25.15%
• 6M: 22.65%
• 1Y: 27.62%
• 3Y*: 14.59%
• 5Y*: 14.52%
• 10Y*: 11.35%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund	15.45%	7.31%	4.23%	19.02%	-6.24%	34.54%	-5.98%	20.59%	-17.41%	6.12%
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	25.15%	5.76%	8.53%	0.69%	23.32%	43.83%	-9.18%	19.37%	-12.02%	10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVQX and PCLIX is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.06
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.19
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2013	0.26

The correlation between LSVQX and PCLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LSVQX vs. PCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVQX

LSVQX Risk / Return Rank: 58
LSVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
LSVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
LSVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 46
LSVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
LSVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PCLIX

PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 27
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LSVQX	PCLIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.27	+0.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	1.75	+1.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.23	+0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.58	1.93	+1.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.59	8.19	+2.40

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVQX Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is higher than the PCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVQX and PCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVQX drawdown since its inception was -54.77%, smaller than the maximum PCLIX drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVQX and PCLIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSVQX	PCLIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.77%	-66.60%	+11.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.48%	-12.82%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.76%	-12.82%	-12.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.76%	-21.59%	-4.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-54.77%	-51.78%	-2.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.62%	-12.82%	+11.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.42%	-24.09%	+16.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.86%	3.42%	-0.56%

Volatility

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) is 3.73%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a volatility of 4.65%. This indicates that LSVQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSVQX	PCLIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	4.65%	-0.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.43%	17.22%	-6.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.70%	19.55%	-3.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.30%	19.42%	+0.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.31%	40.55%	-16.24%

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLIX's 0.98% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Dividend Comparison

LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%, less than PCLIX's 11.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund	7.04%	8.13%	1.78%	4.73%	2.02%	1.45%	1.83%	2.04%	7.00%	4.78%	2.35%	3.59%
PCLIX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund	11.13%	2.45%	7.50%	5.06%	42.60%	73.41%	0.77%	2.46%	18.58%	12.63%	0.16%	2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSVQX and PCLIX in my portfolio?

LSVQX and PCLIX have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSVQX or PCLIX?

PCLIX has higher volatility (4.65%) compared to LSVQX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVQX dropped -54.77% vs PCLIX's -66.60%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.