PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSVQX vs. PCLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVQX achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly lower than PCLIX's 34.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX has underperformed PCLIX with an annualized return of 9.14%, while PCLIX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.


LSVQX

1D
-0.58%
1M
2.52%
6M
16.34%
YTD
21.19%
1Y
33.57%
3Y*
12.69%
5Y*
10.19%
10Y*
9.14%
ALL TIME*
9.45%

PCLIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.86%
6M
25.51%
YTD
34.31%
1Y
39.01%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
5.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
21.19%7.31%4.23%19.02%-6.24%34.54%-5.98%20.59%-17.41%6.12%
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
34.31%5.76%8.53%0.69%23.32%43.83%-9.18%19.37%-12.02%10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVQX and PCLIX is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2013

0.25

The correlation between LSVQX and PCLIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSVQX vs. PCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSVQX
LSVQX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
LSVQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVQX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVQX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

PCLIX
PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSVQXPCLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.31

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

2.34

+1.28

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.13

7.89

+3.25

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the PCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVQX and PCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVQX drawdown since its inception was -54.77%, smaller than the maximum PCLIX drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVQX and PCLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSVQXPCLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.77%

-66.60%

+11.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.48%

-15.39%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.76%

-15.39%

-10.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.76%

-21.59%

-4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.77%

-51.78%

-2.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.37%

-6.44%

+5.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-24.00%

+16.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.76%

4.59%

-1.83%

Volatility

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) is 3.49%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) has a volatility of 5.97%. This indicates that LSVQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSVQXPCLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.49%

5.97%

-2.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

17.90%

-7.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

19.99%

-4.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.12%

19.48%

+0.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.23%

40.52%

-16.29%

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSVQX vs. PCLIX - Dividend Comparison

LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, less than PCLIX's 10.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSVQX
LSV Small Cap Value Fund
6.70%8.13%1.78%4.73%2.02%1.45%1.83%2.04%7.00%4.78%2.35%3.59%
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
10.37%2.45%7.50%5.06%42.60%73.41%0.77%2.46%18.58%12.63%0.16%2.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSVQX and PCLIX have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCLIX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to LSVQX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVQX dropped -54.77% vs PCLIX's -66.60%.

LSVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSVQX and PCLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer