LSVQX vs. DHSCX
LSVQX (LSV Small Cap Value Fund) and DHSCX (Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX returned 9.14%/yr vs 10.63%/yr for DHSCX. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. LSVQX charges 0.83%/yr vs 1.26%/yr for DHSCX.
Performance
LSVQX vs. DHSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSVQX achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly lower than DHSCX's 27.91% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX has underperformed DHSCX with an annualized return of 9.14%, while DHSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.63% annualized return.
LSVQX
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 16.34%
- YTD
- 21.19%
- 1Y
- 33.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 10.19%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.45%
DHSCX
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- 19.95%
- YTD
- 27.91%
- 1Y
- 42.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.29%
- 5Y*
- 13.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LSVQX vs. DHSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund | 21.19% | 7.31% | 4.23% | 19.02% | -6.24% | 34.54% | -5.98% | 20.59% | -17.41% | 6.12% |
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 27.91% | 11.48% | 12.75% | 23.99% | -15.11% | 32.30% | -0.54% | 21.45% | -15.23% | 10.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSVQX and DHSCX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.91 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.93 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2013 | 0.93 |
The correlation between LSVQX and DHSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSVQX vs. DHSCX — Risk / Return Rank
LSVQX
DHSCX
LSVQX vs. DHSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSVQX | DHSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.33 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 3.47 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.13 | 11.34 | -0.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSVQX vs. DHSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSVQX drawdown since its inception was -54.77%, roughly equal to the maximum DHSCX drawdown of -53.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVQX and DHSCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSVQX | DHSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.77% | -53.15% | -1.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.48% | -11.02% | +2.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.76% | -28.41% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.76% | -28.41% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.77% | -46.19% | -8.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.37% | -1.40% | +0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -8.27% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.76% | 3.38% | -0.62% |
Volatility
LSVQX vs. DHSCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) is 3.49%, while Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund (DHSCX) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that LSVQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSVQX | DHSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.49% | 5.78% | -2.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.12% | 14.11% | -3.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.17% | 19.87% | -4.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.12% | 21.49% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.23% | 22.24% | +1.99% |
LSVQX vs. DHSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSVQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than DHSCX's 1.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSVQX vs. DHSCX - Dividend Comparison
LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.70%, more than DHSCX's 4.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHSCX Diamond Hill Small Cap Fund | 4.54% | 5.80% | 16.10% | 30.73% | 18.17% | 17.43% | 0.32% | 6.94% | 10.29% | 6.68% | 2.50% | 1.63% |
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund | 6.70% | 8.13% | 1.78% | 4.73% | 2.02% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 7.00% | 4.78% | 2.35% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSVQX and DHSCX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DHSCX has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to LSVQX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVQX dropped -54.77% vs DHSCX's -53.15%.
LSVQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSVQX and DHSCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer