LSVQX vs. ACWD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L).
LSVQX is managed by LSV. It was launched on Feb 28, 2013. ACWD.L is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Index. It was launched on May 13, 2011.
Performance
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund | 0.70% | 7.31% | 4.23% | 19.02% | -6.24% | 34.54% | -5.98% | 20.59% | -17.41% | 6.12% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | -4.40% | 22.83% | 17.76% | 22.27% | -18.37% | 18.77% | 15.91% | 25.80% | -9.85% | 24.09% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSVQX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly higher than ACWD.L's -4.40% return. Over the past 10 years, LSVQX has underperformed ACWD.L with an annualized return of 7.85%, while ACWD.L has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.
LSVQX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 2.18%
- 1Y
- 13.63%
- 3Y*
- 10.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.85%
ACWD.L
- 1D
- 0.45%
- 1M
- -7.78%
- YTD
- -4.40%
- 6M
- -0.14%
- 1Y
- 20.33%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 9.12%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSVQX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWD.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L — Risk / Return Rank
LSVQX
ACWD.L
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) and SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSVQX | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.68 | 1.31 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.10 | 1.83 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.27 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 1.62 | -0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 7.54 | -4.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSVQX | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 | 1.31 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.32 | 0.59 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 | 0.72 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.66 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSVQX and ACWD.L is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L - Dividend Comparison
LSVQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.07%, while ACWD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVQX LSV Small Cap Value Fund | 8.07% | 8.13% | 1.78% | 4.73% | 2.02% | 1.45% | 1.83% | 2.04% | 7.00% | 4.78% | 2.35% | 3.59% |
ACWD.L SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSVQX drawdown since its inception was -54.77%, which is greater than ACWD.L's maximum drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVQX and ACWD.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSVQX | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.77% | -33.64% | -21.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.48% | -11.57% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.76% | -26.18% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.77% | -33.64% | -21.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.29% | -8.25% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.53% | -4.72% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.91% | 2.49% | +1.42% |
Volatility
LSVQX vs. ACWD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for LSV Small Cap Value Fund (LSVQX) is 4.35%, while SPDR MSCI All Country World UCITS ETF (ACWD.L) has a volatility of 5.31%. This indicates that LSVQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACWD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSVQX | ACWD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 5.31% | -0.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.19% | 8.88% | +2.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.69% | 15.49% | +5.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.51% | 15.43% | +5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.30% | 15.76% | +8.54% |