PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSVD vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSVD vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVD achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.37% return.


LSVD

1D
-0.43%
1M
7.12%
YTD
17.67%
6M
18.95%
1Y
43.26%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.27%
YTD
2.37%
6M
2.51%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVD vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LSVD
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
17.67%22.29%0.14%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.37%4.96%0.28%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVD and IBIC is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024

-0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSVD vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVD
LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVD vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSVDIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

2.24

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.38

17.27

-11.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.69

67.45

-42.76

LSVD vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVD Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 5.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVD and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSVDIBICDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.41

5.05

-1.64

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

3.49

-1.83

Drawdowns

LSVD vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVD drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVD and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSVDIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.30%

-0.90%

-18.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.07%

-0.26%

-7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.13%

-0.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.47%

-0.10%

-2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.76%

0.07%

+1.69%

Volatility

LSVD vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) has a higher volatility of 3.36% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.33%. This indicates that LSVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSVDIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.36%

0.33%

+3.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

0.67%

+8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

0.90%

+11.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.45%

1.58%

+15.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

1.58%

+15.87%

LSVD vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSVD vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

LSVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%
LSVD
LSV Disciplined Value ETF
0.27%0.32%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSVD and IBIC have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSVD has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to IBIC (0.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVD dropped -19.30% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, LSVD leads with 43.26% vs 4.54% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LSVD has performed better with a 43.26% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.

LSVD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: LSV and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LSVD and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.05 vs 3.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSVD and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer