LSVD vs. COMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) and COMT (iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LSVD is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by LSV, while COMT is a Commodities fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, LSVD returned 43.26% vs 47.51% for COMT. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. LSVD charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.

Performance

LSVD vs. COMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSVD achieves a 17.67% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 39.67% return.

LSVD

• 1D: -0.43%
• 1M: 7.12%
• YTD: 17.67%
• 6M: 18.95%
• 1Y: 43.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COMT

• 1D: 0.78%
• 1M: -4.35%
• YTD: 39.67%
• 6M: 39.06%
• 1Y: 47.51%
• 3Y*: 16.86%
• 5Y*: 13.50%
• 10Y*: 9.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSVD vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	17.67%	22.29%	0.14%
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	39.67%	6.07%	2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between LSVD and COMT is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.22
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2024	-0.05

The correlation between LSVD and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LSVD vs. COMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LSVD	COMT
Technology	34.8%	-
Communication Services	15.4%	-
Financial Services	12.5%	100.0%
Consumer Cyclical	12.0%	-
Healthcare	11.8%	-
Industrials	4.8%	-
Consumer Defensive	3.2%	-
Energy	2.0%	-
Basic Materials	1.5%	-
Real Estate	1.2%	-
Utilities	0.8%	-

Return for Risk

LSVD vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 92
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 93

COMT

COMT Risk / Return Rank: 71
COMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
COMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
COMT Omega Ratio Rank: 64
COMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
COMT Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSVD vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) and iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSVD	COMT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.41	2.24	+1.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.64	2.88	+1.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	1.40	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.38	5.95	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.69	14.11	+10.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSVD vs. COMT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSVD Sharpe Ratio is 3.41, which is higher than the COMT Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSVD and COMT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSVD	COMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.41	2.24	+1.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.64	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.66	0.20	+1.45

Drawdowns

LSVD vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSVD drawdown since its inception was -19.30%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSVD and COMT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSVD	COMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.30%	-51.89%	+32.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.07%	-8.02%	-0.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.31%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.00%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-39.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-4.82%	+4.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.47%	-24.07%	+21.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	3.38%	-1.62%

Volatility

LSVD vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD) is 3.36%, while iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 7.37%. This indicates that LSVD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSVD	COMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.36%	7.37%	-4.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.52%	18.80%	-9.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.76%	21.29%	-8.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.45%	21.06%	-3.61%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.45%	18.89%	-1.44%

LSVD vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSVD has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.

Dividends

LSVD vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison

LSVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.27%, less than COMT's 5.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
COMT iShares Commodities Select Strategy ETF	5.54%	7.74%	4.90%	5.19%	29.79%	17.79%	0.36%	2.61%	11.65%	5.16%	0.52%	1.44%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.27%	0.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LSVD and COMT in my portfolio?

LSVD and COMT have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LSVD or COMT?

COMT has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to LSVD (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSVD dropped -19.30% vs COMT's -51.89%.

Which ETF is better, LSVD or COMT?

On 1-year performance, COMT leads with 47.51% vs 43.26% for LSVD. On fees, LSVD is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, LSVD has been the lower-risk option at 3.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LSVD or COMT?

Over the 1-year period, COMT has performed better with a 47.51% return vs 43.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LSVD or COMT?

LSVD is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LSVD or COMT?

COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.54%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between LSVD and COMT?

LSVD is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while COMT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: LSV and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for LSVD and 0.48% for COMT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LSVD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.41 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.